From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64593858C83
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat,  5 Nov 2022 11:25:30 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D64593858C83
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id t25so19238065ejb.8
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 04:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=o8tw9aI/dQ10oI8rA3+XfAZNB6eIkAOsosY2OQaxCZI=;
        b=Gk3/aKdzxKEDljAmA3y1qE2ck+itxj4kepuspfj8xvXvbVkk8jBsGLbCwRS+AHf2le
         Ia57NnkKqG1+3+JJe8bZv/1MVYG5ddVgBZpvu5yIPhYo4+jwr+RZ3Pp083aIPJAi1VUR
         64OuevAnHzRCThaQy5TjOFzdO5j0MmvNFEp+AZDRlX0ZSDOuPRiuRqji/yn24geyxF5F
         tgIeG/7StV144shj6ZiJyslZQe1dT3OM18H7CESjsi3v1sA0mMFhuwG4GboMk8z//Ju7
         SX5/fdMh5vy09iLvES+qFUh7KnQCO+DC7ZgUTFD9BsNEjQqw/55xNH0KnFVXi78nOHyz
         fqtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=o8tw9aI/dQ10oI8rA3+XfAZNB6eIkAOsosY2OQaxCZI=;
        b=dRkqq5B7h4tSmpa9owuXGI92yNVpjmaY4U6c1COuy0iFfnC6erJe3nJI5fXVKjciRX
         uUsx1qx0RPaa0869NSjtE3eJwtPv63vPlwAyPkZWACz///FKrEEri/wMqi9hGyNYL9tB
         Q4JFwWgaPXWWfp/DtdWlvYm/zKP383W5QzPfz0GLbS47XVptvXjp6lxz2oQS7cAFVib7
         iEmwK4PQw0jCfq0ta3THCIhGOiDww9KiFwSbTU3zq7hMFwT0YxiRoso9vhqQnMAwjfOE
         eswGdB6voR6dPI5IxBX6s4bFFne6lGY7Ay2PEWL7QhI2V/naMJMs/KGT8/FMAn4SlWS5
         IskQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1qCHFZrBKKO3adZ9gzdMwyFcYNJzeY8pNuEpG9rB8ZzkPhqKdl
	zvq4OP8BhDbYbNAt9YxjXWvQJAyAVnzholH2OP0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4hFiBMaOLG1Fkg4XLQ7K6GlXR9x8D7z54Xq6gkK+KJ9lVKcWx5L3/4K/m41uKbIYmmPYHU2Y/rHEZHKmEWd5s=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d93:b0:7ad:8319:d095 with SMTP id
 go19-20020a1709070d9300b007ad8319d095mr38003077ejc.511.1667647529643; Sat, 05
 Nov 2022 04:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <546be11b-5bb6-e312-e309-291787d25018@linux.ibm.com>
 <e6f09c41-e7a0-960d-6678-641ddc634c02@linux.ibm.com> <CAFULd4ZWMgVjNduHmnU1kdHtTjDadVs740F7YnVT9TKs=XDZMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5066b86d-81a8-5a81-cbbb-4b2b8f57ad98@linux.ibm.com> <CAFULd4aSDhL4ZJRymkJo-OKFnA4HbnADHZCaHk7f6hJDm9iL-A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4aSDhL4ZJRymkJo-OKFnA4HbnADHZCaHk7f6hJDm9iL-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 12:25:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc0pt3iUyiNdaWJz52ksF1nASGcccsHaDktG57qzYwYaRw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: optabs: Variable index vec_set
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.ibm.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:46 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:45 PM Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > IIRC, I was trying to "fix" modeless operand by giving it a mode, but
> > > since it made no difference for x86, I later dropped the patch.
> > > However, operand with a known mode is preferred, so if it works for
> > > you, just include my patch in your submission. My patch is somehow
> > > trivial if we want operand to have known mode.
> >
> > I'd prefer to push it separately as my patch changes several things in
> > the s390 backend that are kind of unrelated.  Is it OK to do an x86
> > bootstrap and regtest and push it if everything looks good?  You can of
> > course also do it yourself :)
>
> It is a middle-end patch, someone will have to approve it.

The patch is OK

> Uros.