From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: apinski@marvell.com
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix PR middle-end/107705: ICE after reclaration error
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:45:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc0sJtEivF=WnQ7CMp93PSROHF3p2JtyhdzRjFGhXY6B6w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1668741911-1727-2-git-send-email-apinski@marvell.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 4:26 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
>
> The problem here is after we created a call expression
> in the C front-end, we replace the decl type with
> an error mark node. We then end up calling
> aggregate_value_p with the call expression
> with the decl with the error mark as the type
> and we ICE.
>
> The fix is to check the function type
> after we process the call expression inside
> aggregate_value_p to get it.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
OK.
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR middle-end/107705
> * function.cc (aggregate_value_p): Return 0 if
> the function type was an error operand.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/redecl-22.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/function.cc | 3 +++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-22.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-22.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/function.cc b/gcc/function.cc
> index 361aa5f7ed1..9c8773bbc59 100644
> --- a/gcc/function.cc
> +++ b/gcc/function.cc
> @@ -2090,6 +2090,9 @@ aggregate_value_p (const_tree exp, const_tree fntype)
> if (VOID_TYPE_P (type))
> return 0;
>
> + if (error_operand_p (fntype))
> + return 0;
> +
> /* If a record should be passed the same as its first (and only) member
> don't pass it as an aggregate. */
> if (TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE && TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (type))
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-22.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-22.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..7758570fabe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-22.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 107705 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-w" } */
> +int f (void)
> +{
> + int (*p) (void) = 0; // { dg-note "" }
> + return p ();
> + int p = 1; // { dg-error "" }
> +}
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 3:25 [PATCH 1/2] Fix PRs 106764, 106765, and 107307, all ICE after invalid re-declaration apinski
2022-11-18 3:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] Fix PR middle-end/107705: ICE after reclaration error apinski
2022-11-18 8:45 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2022-11-18 8:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] Fix PRs 106764, 106765, and 107307, all ICE after invalid re-declaration Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc0sJtEivF=WnQ7CMp93PSROHF3p2JtyhdzRjFGhXY6B6w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=apinski@marvell.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).