public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
		Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [df-scan.c] Optimise DF_REFs ordering in collection_rec, use HARD_REG_SETs instead of bitmaps
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc0vguN7Mnz2jGsfwf6-9G=VbudbHGoUvxjveSytyTMKxg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1107080549070.1237@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs():
> * First it uses HARD_REG_SETs for defs_generated and
> regs_invalidated_by_call, instead of bitmaps. Replacing in total more than
> 400K calls (for my testcase) to bitmap_bit_p() with the much faster
> TEST_HARD_REG_BIT, reduces the total instruction count from about 13M to
> 1.5M.
> * Second it produces the REFs in REGNO order, which is important to keep the
> collection_rec sorted most times, and avoid expensive calls to qsort().
> Thanks to Paolo Bonzini for idea and mentoring.
>
> The second part makes a big difference if accompanied with another patch in
> df_insn_refs_collect(). I'll post a followup patch, that is unfortunately
> unstable for some of my tests, so I'd appreciate any comments.

Did you check the impact on memory usage?  I suppose on targets
with not many hard registers it should even improve, but do we expect
memory usage to be worse in any case?

Thanks,
Richard.

>
> Thanks,
> Dimitris
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-08  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-08  3:33 Dimitrios Apostolou
2011-07-08  3:52 ` Dimitrios Apostolou
2011-07-08  6:36 ` Dimitrios Apostolou
2011-07-08  7:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-07-09  1:29     ` Dimitrios Apostolou
2011-07-08  6:37 ` Steven Bosscher
2011-07-08  7:04   ` Dimitrios Apostolou
2011-07-08  6:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-08  9:09   ` Dimitrios Apostolou
2011-07-08 14:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-07-08 14:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-07-08  8:42 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2011-07-08 10:20   ` Dimitrios Apostolou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFiYyc0vguN7Mnz2jGsfwf6-9G=VbudbHGoUvxjveSytyTMKxg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jimis@gmx.net \
    --cc=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).