From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Fix PR 110954: wrong code with cmp | !cmp
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1+p5aG-pbxoWr66JyEUcXKh0=2OQJLBKeVBZYe28HiZg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810225121.2732876-1-apinski@marvell.com>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:52 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> This was an oversight on my part forgetting that
> cmp will might have a different true value than all ones
> but will have a value of 1 in most cases.
> This means if we have `(f < 0) | !(f < 0)` we would
> optimize this to -1 rather than just 1.
>
> This is version 2 of the patch.
> Decided to go down a different route than just checking if
> the precission was 1 inside bitwise_inverted_equal_p.
> So instead bitwise_inverted_equal_p gets passed an argument
> that will be set if there was a comparison that was being compared
> and the user of bitwise_inverted_equal_p decides what needs to be done.
> In most uses of bitwise_inverted_equal_p, the check will be
> `!wascmp || element_precision (type) == 1` .
> But in the case of `a & ~a` and `a ^| ~a` we can handle the case
> of wascmp by using constant_boolean_node isntead.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> PR 110954
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * generic-match-head.cc (bitwise_inverted_equal_p): Add
> wascmp argument and set it accordingly.
> * gimple-match-head.cc (bitwise_inverted_equal_p): Add
> wascmp argument to the macro.
> (gimple_bitwise_inverted_equal_p): Add
> wascmp argument and set it accordingly.
> * match.pd (`a & ~a`, `a ^| ~a`): Update call
> to bitwise_inverted_equal_p and handle wascmp case.
> (`(~x | y) & x`, `(~x | y) & x`, `a?~t:t`): Update
> call to bitwise_inverted_equal_p and check to see
> if was !wascmp or if precision was 1.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr110954-1.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/generic-match-head.cc | 4 +-
> gcc/gimple-match-head.cc | 8 ++--
> gcc/match.pd | 41 +++++++++++--------
> .../gcc.c-torture/execute/pr110954-1.c | 10 +++++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr110954-1.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/generic-match-head.cc b/gcc/generic-match-head.cc
> index ddaf22f2179..f40a35c48a6 100644
> --- a/gcc/generic-match-head.cc
> +++ b/gcc/generic-match-head.cc
> @@ -127,10 +127,11 @@ bitwise_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2)
> The types can differ through nop conversions. */
>
> static inline bool
> -bitwise_inverted_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2)
> +bitwise_inverted_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2, bool &wascmp)
> {
> STRIP_NOPS (expr1);
> STRIP_NOPS (expr2);
> + wascmp = false;
> if (expr1 == expr2)
> return false;
> if (!tree_nop_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (expr1), TREE_TYPE (expr2)))
> @@ -150,6 +151,7 @@ bitwise_inverted_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2)
> {
> tree op10 = TREE_OPERAND (expr1, 0);
> tree op20 = TREE_OPERAND (expr2, 0);
> + wascmp = true;
> if (!operand_equal_p (op10, op20))
> return false;
> tree op11 = TREE_OPERAND (expr1, 1);
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc b/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc
> index a097a494c39..ea6387a1099 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc
> @@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ gimple_bitwise_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2, tree (*valueize) (tree))
> /* Return true if EXPR1 and EXPR2 have the bitwise opposite value,
> but not necessarily same type.
> The types can differ through nop conversions. */
> -#define bitwise_inverted_equal_p(expr1, expr2) \
> - gimple_bitwise_inverted_equal_p (expr1, expr2, valueize)
> +#define bitwise_inverted_equal_p(expr1, expr2, wascmp) \
> + gimple_bitwise_inverted_equal_p (expr1, expr2, wascmp, valueize)
>
>
> bool gimple_bit_not_with_nop (tree, tree *, tree (*) (tree));
> @@ -277,8 +277,9 @@ bool gimple_maybe_cmp (tree, tree *, tree (*) (tree));
> /* Helper function for bitwise_equal_p macro. */
>
> static inline bool
> -gimple_bitwise_inverted_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2, tree (*valueize) (tree))
> +gimple_bitwise_inverted_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2, bool &wascmp, tree (*valueize) (tree))
> {
> + wascmp = false;
> if (expr1 == expr2)
> return false;
> if (!tree_nop_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (expr1), TREE_TYPE (expr2)))
> @@ -331,6 +332,7 @@ gimple_bitwise_inverted_equal_p (tree expr1, tree expr2, tree (*valueize) (tree)
> tree op21 = do_valueize (valueize, gimple_assign_rhs2 (a2));
> if (!operand_equal_p (op11, op21))
> return false;
> + wascmp = true;
> if (invert_tree_comparison (gimple_assign_rhs_code (a1),
> HONOR_NANS (op10))
> == gimple_assign_rhs_code (a2))
> diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> index fc630b63563..6791060891d 100644
> --- a/gcc/match.pd
> +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> @@ -1179,9 +1179,10 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> /* Simplify ~X & X as zero. */
> (simplify
> (bit_and (convert? @0) (convert? @1))
> - (if (types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), TREE_TYPE (@1))
> - && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@0, @1))
> - { build_zero_cst (type); }))
> + (with { bool wascmp; }
> + (if (types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), TREE_TYPE (@1))
> + && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@0, @1, wascmp))
> + { wascmp ? constant_boolean_node (false, type) : build_zero_cst (type); })))
>
> /* PR71636: Transform x & ((1U << b) - 1) -> x & ~(~0U << b); */
> (simplify
> @@ -1419,9 +1420,13 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> (for op (bit_ior bit_xor)
> (simplify
> (op (convert? @0) (convert? @1))
> - (if (types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), TREE_TYPE (@1))
> - && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@0, @1))
> - (convert { build_all_ones_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); }))))
> + (with { bool wascmp; }
> + (if (types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), TREE_TYPE (@1))
> + && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@0, @1, wascmp))
> + (convert
> + { wascmp
> + ? constant_boolean_node (true, type)
> + : build_all_ones_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })))))
>
> /* x ^ x -> 0 */
> (simplify
> @@ -1969,8 +1974,10 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> /* (~x & y) | x -> x | y */
> (simplify
> (bitop:c (rbitop:c @2 @1) @0)
> - (if (bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@0, @2))
> - (bitop @0 @1))))
> + (with { bool wascmp; }
> + (if (bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@0, @2, wascmp)
> + && (!wascmp || element_precision (type) == 1))
> + (bitop @0 @1)))))
>
> /* ((x | y) & z) | x -> (z & y) | x */
> (simplify
> @@ -6464,14 +6471,16 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> /* a?~t:t -> (-(a))^t */
> (simplify
> (cond @0 @1 @2)
> - (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> - && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@1, @2))
> - (with {
> - auto prec = TYPE_PRECISION (type);
> - auto unsign = TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);
> - tree inttype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, unsign);
> - }
> - (convert (bit_xor (negate (convert:inttype @0)) (convert:inttype @2))))))
> + (with { bool wascmp; }
> + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> + && bitwise_inverted_equal_p (@1, @2, wascmp)
> + && (!wascmp || element_precision (type) == 1))
> + (with {
> + auto prec = TYPE_PRECISION (type);
> + auto unsign = TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);
> + tree inttype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, unsign);
> + }
> + (convert (bit_xor (negate (convert:inttype @0)) (convert:inttype @2)))))))
> #endif
>
> /* Simplify pointer equality compares using PTA. */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr110954-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr110954-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..8aad758e10f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr110954-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +
> +#define comparison (f < 0)
> +int main() {
> + int f = 0;
> + int d = comparison | !comparison;
> + if (d != 1)
> + __builtin_abort();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> --
> 2.31.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 22:51 Andrew Pinski
2023-08-11 6:46 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc1+p5aG-pbxoWr66JyEUcXKh0=2OQJLBKeVBZYe28HiZg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=apinski@marvell.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).