From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83901 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 09:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83887 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 09:22:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:22:28 +0000 Received: by iehx8 with SMTP id x8so14027080ieh.3 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.13.201 with SMTP id 192mr20564400ion.70.1437729746087; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.142.7 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand From: Richard Biener To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: David Edelsohn , Alexandre Oliva , Jeff Law , Segher Boessenkool , GCC Patches , Christophe Lyon , Eric Botcazou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02027.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:19 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>>>>> Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking >>>>>> this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch at the end): >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately it causes about a thousand test fails on powerpc64-linux >>>>> (at least, it seems to be this patch, I haven't actually checked). >>>>> >>>> >>>> It also caused: >>>> >>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978 >>>> >>> >>> and maybe: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983 >> >> I request that this patch be reverted (again). > > And I request to test any new patches under x32 before checking in. > You can use Ubuntu 14 to test x32. x32 is neither primary nor secondary arch. Richard. > Thanks. > > -- > H.J.