Re: [patch] 19/n: trans-mem: compiler tree/gimple stuff

[Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> Richi, if it's the use of the bit in the tree node that you're worried
>>> about,
>>> we could probably put it in cgraph_node.local instead.  But we do need
>>> the
>>> knowledge.
>>
>> Yeah, I was worried about /* 1 bit left */ ;)  Putting it in the
>> cgraph node sounds more appealing
>> indeed.
>
>
> Richi, is this a blocker, or merely a suggestion?  If this is a requirement
> for merging, I can do so.  Just want to make sure where best to spend my
> time.

Well - we usually don't grab bits off the tree nodes lightly.  Especially if
the cgraph seems to be more fit.

> If this is a suggestion, I can put it on my laundry list of future things
> todo (after merge, 4.8?, etc).

There are not many consumers of the flag, so fixing it shouldn't be hard.
For 4.7 definitely.

Thanks,
Richard.