From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-304280-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14498 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2011 09:23:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 14489 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2011 09:23:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:23:04 +0000
Received: by ggnq1 with SMTP id q1so1850159ggn.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.38.20 with SMTP id q20mr2953163ybj.90.1318497784205; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.9.9 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FBBB5E59-48A7-431D-BD33-8A19FF474A75@comcast.net>
References: <CABYV9SVTb_gcYDa-yeXi75tQg0yVkFsG3wUpS=L5VXH2BCArNw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc3hwSCVHWuO9qTthgoede7vjK1VRnroh0dbfO8qtxbafg@mail.gmail.com>	<CABYV9SUm6NV+U_iyRBP=BfBKQdOy1A6=EV+LgSyRSC39DZj=zg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0OtGVb_gCmh0Qq5wuMAHGDqZjzCdWPDwd0zOFkr6o8xw@mail.gmail.com>	<CABYV9SXXoXQs4ER3nP_JDVWE0KcrJZB6dWw5h3GC=ZaxgGuvLw@mail.gmail.com>	<CABYV9SXjLcgavRG6dxu5pwaN9vK6ZkZh=ErsNTKeS-RDpDetyg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc2u_c98LTLRJRj6w5rKCci5U_jku3MFAQPT=z6n64_qcA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABYV9SVcmb3uncoruZ158frfYrFgn1=7Rg903OkxKHps3H71rw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc1EHd=QyT6btcWKvXaKMBZqVjbU4kQn-6hdic14rZsCAQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CABYV9SWNg-WTX_g-dd3zv5L5h0cAnGSh+sVG2YDFe+8buEJJGA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOr6CMJ7+u76FQus6wHkJxTxbFkOWThFDGNqQhShStLeWQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CABYV9SUkYuMRzoH5z8VRtZPxM9G=xd3p1FK5hwtdo2XUonkjbw@mail.gmail.com>	<FBBB5E59-48A7-431D-BD33-8A19FF474A75@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc141Q3dv8n28VC+3Pp3bPTpNZvJqao0REqdUF3TPdWpdw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New warning for expanded vector operations
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
Cc: Artem Shinkarov <artyom.shinkaroff@gmail.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg01078.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Artem Shinkarov wrote:
>> This patch fixed PR50704.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite:
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-3.c: Exclude ia32 target.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c: Ditto.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-2.c: Ditto.
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
>
> Ok. =A0Is this x32 clean? =A0:-) =A0If not, HJ will offer an even better =
spelling.

I suppose you instead want sth like

{ dg-require-effective-target lp64 }

?