From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 44356 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2016 13:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44344 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2016 13:47:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=site X-HELO: mail-yw0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.161.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:47:55 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f180.google.com with SMTP id g127so118863023ywf.2 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:47:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lXI33pWD0kvJVd3XWcFHWym/9jhtl0DvgzVTNikmyZo=; b=CdHsriLu+HvSsWQ7v4ADkxTu/wEmWI+2rUhoOwL30VHgfjdW8SfSFckj8oFqf+ItVO VwS0QT+J61NDa7Bvt6fzvHByV6yp1TEZliWCcsGzi5gxboeI7s/IhG4yUA69Ft51Bozh 44egJkPVp7osOkkDOmtuuJypcCwkmgx0BxJfep2D8UW+pZUZqC/ex47q8I3UE3u/qCln on/1zdgDiG6QsvBhwz3ThvzyIHQHmn3Nzo4sYF4Hjaz86imDGsmA7DSK1yWUdTpHu5BB m7Bp9Sgj4/ynNYrvheqKSEsOTY4cBZf/cNw8pWUQQhSthJHY0rGF7F5By3iV59jWUiJ+ ZW2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR5FldyaJE89oJ6f+QUwPBBFKR2y8Fu1rQjM3umgwXFnL7BD/zR7T1JC7QCQEvMxg3D/tdhnlVyAkespw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.31.131 with SMTP id f125mr13426138ywf.267.1456148873715; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.202.214 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:47:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Obvious change, dump min_profitable_estimate, rather than min_profitable_iters From: Richard Biener To: Bin Cheng Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , nd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg01462.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > This is an obvious change to vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters. Given the context, it should dump min_profitable_estimate at patch site, rather than min_profitable_iters. Or I must mis-understood something in the code. > Build successfully, no test needed. Is it OK? I am not sure obvious change rule can be applied during stage4 or not. Ok to commit. RIchard. > Thanks, > bin > > 2016-02-22 Bin Cheng > > * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters): Dump > min_profitable_estimate, rather than min_profitable_iters.