From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-400137-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 36253 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2015 13:35:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36237 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jun 2015 13:35:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f49.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f49.google.com) (209.85.218.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:35:56 +0000
Received: by oigz2 with SMTP id z2so11769062oig.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.230.75 with SMTP id sw11mr19008716obc.60.1433856954173; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.115.167 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 06:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1KOAh9epZzOJEg=CzAYkonHOx+XWykXih_B0OZd=kgTLSG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5576E606.1060407@suse.cz>	<CAFiYyc3cJNiyZMufB+1_cn-c0ATd3MD4J+TiRPx5w-=EL9J6yQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJ1KOAh9epZzOJEg=CzAYkonHOx+XWykXih_B0OZd=kgTLSG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1A-ROZ4qBHZaF5K4TxKZrLYWVKgjxaRY9eNHCCLk_p5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR bootstrap/66471
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?xLBzbWFpbCBEw7ZubWV6?= <ismail@donmez.ws>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:30 PM, =C4=B0smail D=C3=B6nmez <ismail@donmez.ws> =
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Richard Biener
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Li=C5=A1ka <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Following patch renames an enum values so that they do not clash with a=
 MinGW reserved keyword.
>>
>> Reserved keyword as in a #define?  Thus simply #undef it in system.h?
>
> No, wingdi.h has the following
>
>   typedef struct tagBITMAP {
>     LONG bmType;
>     LONG bmWidth;
>     LONG bmHeight;
>     LONG bmWidthBytes;
>     WORD bmPlanes;
>     WORD bmBitsPixel;
>     LPVOID bmBits;
>   } BITMAP,*PBITMAP,*NPBITMAP,*LPBITMAP;

Hmm. I see.

Patch is ok.

Thanks,
Richard.