* [PATCH] PR c/110699: Defend against error_mark_node in gimplify.cc.
@ 2023-07-19 22:10 Roger Sayle
2023-07-20 7:31 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roger Sayle @ 2023-07-19 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 685 bytes --]
This patch resolves PR c/110699, an ICE-after-error regression, by adding
a check that the array type isn't error_mark_node in gimplify_compound_lval.
This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
2023-07-19 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
PR c/110699
* gimplify.cc (gimplify_compound_lval): For ARRAY_REF and
ARRAY_RANGE_REF return GS_ERROR if the array's type is
error_mark_node.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c/110699
* gcc.dg/pr110699.c: New test case.
Cheers,
Roger
--
[-- Attachment #2: patcher.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1088 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
index 36e5df0..4f40b24 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
@@ -3211,6 +3211,9 @@ gimplify_compound_lval (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, gimple_seq *post_p,
if (TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_REF || TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_RANGE_REF)
{
+ if (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)) == error_mark_node)
+ return GS_ERROR;
+
/* Deal with the low bound and element type size and put them into
the ARRAY_REF. If these values are set, they have already been
gimplified. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110699.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110699.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..be77613
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110699.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+typedef __attribute__((__vector_size__(64))) int T;
+
+void f(void) {
+ extern char a[64], b[64]; /* { dg-message "previous" "note" } */
+ void *p = a;
+ T q = *(T *)&b[0];
+}
+
+void g() {
+ extern char b; /* { dg-error "conflicting types" } */
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PR c/110699: Defend against error_mark_node in gimplify.cc.
2023-07-19 22:10 [PATCH] PR c/110699: Defend against error_mark_node in gimplify.cc Roger Sayle
@ 2023-07-20 7:31 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2023-07-20 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roger Sayle; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 12:11 AM Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> This patch resolves PR c/110699, an ICE-after-error regression, by adding
> a check that the array type isn't error_mark_node in gimplify_compound_lval.
>
> This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
> with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
Can you change it to
if (error_operand_p (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0))
return GS_ERROR;
and do that unconditionally for each 't' on the expr_stack? It seems we only
ever push handled_component_p to it.
OK with that change.
Richard.
>
>
> 2023-07-19 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
> PR c/110699
> * gimplify.cc (gimplify_compound_lval): For ARRAY_REF and
> ARRAY_RANGE_REF return GS_ERROR if the array's type is
> error_mark_node.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> PR c/110699
> * gcc.dg/pr110699.c: New test case.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Roger
> --
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-20 7:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-19 22:10 [PATCH] PR c/110699: Defend against error_mark_node in gimplify.cc Roger Sayle
2023-07-20 7:31 ` Richard Biener
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).