Re: [PATCH] Prettify output of debug_dwarf_die

[Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 8:35 PM Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> When debugging gcc, I tried calling debug_dwarf_die and I saw this
> output:
>
>       DW_AT_location: location descriptor:
>         (0x7fffe9c2e870) DW_OP_dup 0, 0
>         (0x7fffe9c2e8c0) DW_OP_bra location descriptor (0x7fffe9c2e640)
> , 0
>         (0x7fffe9c2e820) DW_OP_lit4 4, 0
>         (0x7fffe9c2e910) DW_OP_skip location descriptor (0x7fffe9c2e9b0)
> , 0
>         (0x7fffe9c2e640) DW_OP_dup 0, 0
>
> I think those ", 0" should not appear on their own lines.  The issue
> seems to be that print_dw_val should not generally emit a newline,
> except when recursing.

OK.

> gcc/ChangeLog
>
>         * dwarf2out.cc (print_dw_val) <dw_val_class_loc>: Don't
>         print newline when not recursing.
> ---
>  gcc/dwarf2out.cc | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> index 8f18bc4fe64..1b0e8b5a5b2 100644
> --- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> +++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> @@ -6651,7 +6651,7 @@ print_dw_val (dw_val_node *val, bool recurse, FILE *outfile)
>      case dw_val_class_loc:
>        fprintf (outfile, "location descriptor");
>        if (val->v.val_loc == NULL)
> -       fprintf (outfile, " -> <null>\n");
> +       fprintf (outfile, " -> <null>");
>        else if (recurse)
>         {
>           fprintf (outfile, ":\n");
> @@ -6662,9 +6662,9 @@ print_dw_val (dw_val_node *val, bool recurse, FILE *outfile)
>        else
>         {
>           if (flag_dump_noaddr || flag_dump_unnumbered)
> -           fprintf (outfile, " #\n");
> +           fprintf (outfile, " #");
>           else
> -           fprintf (outfile, " (%p)\n", (void *) val->v.val_loc);
> +           fprintf (outfile, " (%p)", (void *) val->v.val_loc);
>         }
>        break;
>      case dw_val_class_loc_list:
> --
> 2.43.0
>