public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Always use TYPE_MODE instead of DECL_MODE for vector field
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:33:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1MrZ7t6o3LnbGOsXBqvGtQQES2S9ADapZ5aWX8t_WnYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020165734.1113688-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 6:58 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> commit e034c5c895722e0092d2239cd8c2991db77d6d39
> Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
> Date:   Sat Dec 2 08:54:47 2017 +0100
>
>         PR target/78643
>         PR target/80583
>         * expr.c (get_inner_reference): If DECL_MODE of a non-bitfield
>         is BLKmode for vector field with vector raw mode, use TYPE_MODE
>         instead of DECL_MODE.
>
> fixed the case where DECL_MODE of a vector field is BLKmode and its
> TYPE_MODE is a vector mode because of target attribute.  Remove the
> BLKmode check for the case where DECL_MODE of a vector field is a vector
> mode and its TYPE_MODE is BLKmode because of target attribute.
>
> gcc/
>
>         PR target/107304
>         * expr.c (get_inner_reference): Always use TYPE_MODE for vector
>         field with vector raw mode.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
>         PR target/107304
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr107304.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/expr.cc                              |  3 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107304.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107304.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/expr.cc b/gcc/expr.cc
> index efe387e6173..9145193c2c1 100644
> --- a/gcc/expr.cc
> +++ b/gcc/expr.cc
> @@ -7905,8 +7905,7 @@ get_inner_reference (tree exp, poly_int64_pod *pbitsize,
>           /* For vector fields re-check the target flags, as DECL_MODE
>              could have been set with different target flags than
>              the current function has.  */
> -         if (mode == BLKmode
> -             && VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (field))
> +         if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (field))
>               && VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE_RAW (TREE_TYPE (field))))

Isn't the check on TYPE_MODE_RAW also wrong then?  Btw, the mode could
also be an integer mode.

>             mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (field));
>         }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107304.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107304.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..24d68795e7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107304.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -march=tigerlake" } */
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +typedef union {
> +  uint8_t v __attribute__((aligned(256))) __attribute__ ((vector_size(64 * sizeof(uint8_t))));
> +  uint8_t i[64] __attribute__((aligned(256)));
> +} stress_vec_u8_64_t;
> +
> +typedef struct {
> + struct {
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t s;
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t o;
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t mask1;
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t mask2;
> + } u8_64;
> +} stress_vec_data_t;
> +
> +__attribute__((target_clones("arch=alderlake", "default")))
> +void
> +stress_vecshuf_u8_64(stress_vec_data_t *data)
> +{
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t *__restrict s;
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t *__restrict mask1;
> +  stress_vec_u8_64_t *__restrict mask2;
> +  register int i;
> +
> +  s = &data->u8_64.s;
> +  mask1 = &data->u8_64.mask1;
> +  mask2 = &data->u8_64.mask2;
> +
> +  for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {  /* was i < 65536 */
> +      stress_vec_u8_64_t tmp;
> +
> +      tmp.v = __builtin_shuffle(s->v, mask1->v);
> +      s->v = __builtin_shuffle(tmp.v, mask2->v);
> +  }
> +}
> --
> 2.37.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-21  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 16:57 H.J. Lu
2022-10-21  9:33 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2022-10-21 16:18   ` H.J. Lu
2022-10-24  7:12     ` Richard Biener
2022-10-24 20:01       ` [PATCH v2] " H.J. Lu
2022-10-25  6:27         ` Richard Biener
2022-11-07 20:07           ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-08  9:42             ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc1MrZ7t6o3LnbGOsXBqvGtQQES2S9ADapZ5aWX8t_WnYg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).