public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
Cc: Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com>,
	Aditya Kumar <hiraditya@msn.com>,
		GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Discard Scops for which entry==exit
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 07:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1W6UWXnKUDK52ixnB7ohkWWb0d6aGTohavf2fXQQjDWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559232F5.4040206@grosser.es>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es> wrote:
> On 06/30/2015 02:09 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Aditya Kumar <hiraditya@msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In this patch we discard the scops where entry and exit are the same BB.
>>> This is an effort to remove graphite-scop-detection.c:limit_scops.
>>> Removing the limit_scops function introduces correctness regressions.
>>> We are making relevant changes in incremental steps to fix those bugs,
>>> and finally we intend to remove limit_scops.
>>>
>>> 2015-06-29  Aditya Kumar  <aditya.k7@samsung.com>
>>>              Sebastian Pop <s.pop@samsung.com>
>>>
>>>          * graphite-scop-detection.c (build_scops_1): Discard scops for
>>> which entry==exit
>>
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>> Let's wait on comments from Tobi before pushing this patch.
>
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> the commit message should probably give a short reasoning why scops with
> entry == exit need to be discarded. I currently don't see why they would be
> incorrect/problematic (despite being possibly very small/empty).

Dependent on how GRAPHITE initializes loops even a loop can consist of a single
basic-block (without LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES where you always have at
least two BBs for a loop).

I suppose GRAPHITE does nothing for non-loops and this is what the check is
about?  (so rather require a backedge in the SCOP?)

Of ocurse I also don't see "correctness" issues here, just maybe a waste of
compile-time?

Richard.

> Tobias

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-30  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-29 20:25 Aditya Kumar
2015-06-30  0:13 ` Sebastian Pop
2015-06-30  6:11   ` Tobias Grosser
2015-06-30  7:56     ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-06-30 15:49     ` Aditya K
2015-07-02  7:53       ` Tobias Grosser
2015-07-02 15:37         ` Aditya K
2015-07-02 15:42           ` Tobias Grosser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc1W6UWXnKUDK52ixnB7ohkWWb0d6aGTohavf2fXQQjDWw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hiraditya@msn.com \
    --cc=sebpop@gmail.com \
    --cc=tobias@grosser.es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).