From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD543858D35 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:48:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BCD543858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id f34so27193339lfv.10 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:48:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=koPzPaNnzaRE2bPpO+ulRXHfae91MhP1kyjdhBN9j+M=; b=mBKrox3IcHHOL2jS1hBvEdWLCIM1GKk/XFGH9z1/stokB38xxQrGAakJAlCuofWHOn uAXebHdXn3KU80XZEKK3+udpIuPu1UNHZTRcIbvNNP0vfrd5YyTgExpF5gCFafBhC1bT eWhd13wsZyMkS5DMxE6RqEm/XuUDbctz/5/KS+WN8EbINqUf0JNakR1BhsWXRpj5f4IQ 2TAIPAt4kv4zZYQPqfl5hM4swfs1DcQxtOn78OaxIipwDDaR2KhLOQuf5V4awba+LK0V NQPu+q8ziZrOMj3Fxo+aJNjYNqyvn9DsVue0RZeHooByskPxpXd9TzyPamMGHAobdm29 udIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=koPzPaNnzaRE2bPpO+ulRXHfae91MhP1kyjdhBN9j+M=; b=oh09jxsRlxLZh68/w65wq0MWfNhn0Yi9teS+K/wEX2TvgjxcTQapVtx/Qy67TSHqa6 Yv8CniR5I7yTV8A067a4MA5X1W1TXdvllSUoTR7uDEsUgzmqaVaD1WF9x9R9I7DXWaC2 yJqezNwI/aEA8/TGCUVARx+SwnSqdrY7gMsMbDRI4+f9Xm4t5rZ6PI0jGkyAAMslVoZA UOGZx3xEWKUXrxSuaJnKqzq69sV4Y5MMU4v5kjQ+14FEwHbxVNdvURo8FjkdH6CAAuPN VK6KaZ3LL81Z7v+iKAd++RtMNY/QoswdD2cmqCRsNYeKTwPdviNMhaLIz0/SabJXd2Nm VVaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krAWV9les+c+yE5tp74Vd5cqycZRAYbB0J0NTuNLCpiNTTLTBsn 4/AyuOwrVzrnqgbwQWj9SxXtPpAP8rf5RFugqEw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtQIQy0XBBtMZv/tq3gI8xDNJmlbgchX5PdsHqzsR5YDXNpOIhTNz6rRryPVxhoa8NlPfYVHlLC9pdn6+zHZ9E= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4478:0:b0:4ca:2a23:69d8 with SMTP id y24-20020ac24478000000b004ca2a2369d8mr7794071lfl.599.1673509725127; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:48:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230111183251.GV25951@gate.crashing.org> <20230111190719.GW25951@gate.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: From: Richard Biener Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:48:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Note that old reload is deprecated To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:44 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:09 PM Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > Like if they cannot even build their target libraries aka their build will fail. It would be nice to identify those and, say, make at least -mlra available to all ports that currently do not have a way to enable LRA? > > > > It is up to the target maintainers to make such support, it is a machine > > flag after all (-m are machine flags, -f are more general flags). > > > > There has been ample warning, see > > for example. GCC 13 release will be six years after that, I'd hope that > > that is enough. > > > > Just using > > targetm.lra_p = default_lra_p; > > is enough to test. I don't have a setup to build all targets (that > > requires target headers, to begin with), and it is up to the target > > maintainers to decide how they want things fixed anyway. > > > > I'll put up a preliminary branch for the generic patches, but let me > > update it to trunk first :-) > > Just saying that the changes.html note has not much information but instead will > spread FUD without indicating which ports would be dysfunctional after removing > reload support (aka will even no longer build). So I'd say we don't want this > note in changes.html in the proposed form. Btw, the following is the ports that default to reload and have no command line option to switch to LRA. config/alpha/alpha.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/avr/avr.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/bfin/bfin.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/c6x/c6x.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/cris/cris.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/epiphany/epiphany.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/fr30/fr30.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/frv/frv.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/h8300/h8300.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/ia64/ia64.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/iq2000/iq2000.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/lm32/lm32.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/m32c/m32c.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/m32r/m32r.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/m68k/m68k.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/mcore/mcore.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/microblaze/microblaze.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/mmix/mmix.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/mn10300/mn10300.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/moxie/moxie.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/msp430/msp430.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/nvptx/nvptx.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/pa/pa.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/rl78/rl78.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/stormy16/stormy16.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false config/visium/visium.cc:#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_false