public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Add VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to operand_equal_p
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1X4cDecZ0monVpxXSQ_ywu9anLRNBN9Ay4xx5_tLXtJw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151029150215.GA34652@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>
>> IMHO it was always wrong/fragile for backends to look at the actual arguments to
>> decide on the calling convention.  The backends should _solely_ rely on
>> gimple_call_fntype and its TYPE_ARG_TYPES here.
>>
>> Of course then there are varargs ... (not sure if we hit this here).
>
> Yep, you have varargs and K&R prototypes, so it can't work this way.

Well, then I suppose we need to compute the ABI upfront when we gimplify
from the orginal args (like we preserve fntype).  Having a separate fntype
was really meant to make us preserve the ABI throughout the GIMPLE phase...

>>
>> But yes, the VIEW_CONVERT "stripping" is a bit fragile and I don't remember
>> what exactly we gain from it (when not done on registers).
>
> I guess gain is really limited to Ada - there are very few cases we do VCE otherwise.
> (I think we could do more of them).  We can make useless_type_conversion NOP/CONVERT
> only. That in fact makes quite a sense because those are types with gimple operations
> on it.  Perhaps also VCE on vectors, but not VCE in general.
>
> Honza
>>
>> But I also don't see where we do the stripping mentioned on memory references.
>> The match.pd pattern doesn't apply to memory, only in the GENERIC path
>> which is guarded with exact type equality.  So I can't see where we end up
>> stripping the V_C_E.
>>
>> There is one bogus case still in fold-const.c:
>>
>>     case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR:
>>       if (TREE_CODE (op0) == MEM_REF)
>>         /* ???  Bogus for aligned types.  */
>>         return fold_build2_loc (loc, MEM_REF, type,
>>                                 TREE_OPERAND (op0, 0), TREE_OPERAND (op0, 1));
>>
>>       return NULL_TREE;
>>
>> that comment is only in my local tree ... (we lose alignment info that is
>> on the original MEM_REF type which may be a smaller one).
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>> > Honza
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>       * gnat.dg/discr44.adb: New test.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Eric Botcazou
>> >
>> >> -- { dg-do run }
>> >> -- { dg-options "-gnatws" }
>> >>
>> >> procedure Discr44 is
>> >>
>> >>   function Ident (I : Integer) return Integer is
>> >>   begin
>> >>     return I;
>> >>   end;
>> >>
>> >>   type Int is range 1 .. 10;
>> >>
>> >>   type Str is array (Int range <>) of Character;
>> >>
>> >>   type Parent (D1, D2 : Int; B : Boolean) is record
>> >>     S : Str (D1 .. D2);
>> >>   end record;
>> >>
>> >>   type Derived (D : Int) is new Parent (D1 => D, D2 => D, B => False);
>> >>
>> >>   X1 : Derived (D => Int (Ident (7)));
>> >>
>> >> begin
>> >>   if X1.D /= 7 then
>> >>     raise Program_Error;
>> >>   end if;
>> >> end;
>> >

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-29 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14 16:29 Jan Hubicka
2015-10-15  8:39 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-15 11:22   ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-15 19:47     ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-15 23:24       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-16 15:58         ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-16 21:47           ` Richard Biener
2015-10-17 10:27             ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-17 15:17               ` Richard Biener
2015-10-17 18:57                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-18 12:57                   ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-18 16:37                     ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-18 17:14                       ` Richard Biener
2015-10-18 18:45                         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-19 12:31                           ` Richard Biener
2015-10-19 21:01                             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-19  8:17                         ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-19  7:58                       ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-19 19:46                         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-20  7:02                           ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-21 22:22                             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-22  8:52                               ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-28 22:49                               ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-29  4:35                                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-29 11:31                                   ` Richard Biener
2015-10-29 11:32                                     ` Richard Biener
2015-10-29 11:32                                       ` Richard Biener
2015-11-04  8:51                                       ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-29 15:06                                     ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-29 15:24                                       ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-10-29 15:53                                         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-30  8:57                                           ` Richard Biener
2015-10-30 15:28                                             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-11-02  9:55                                               ` Richard Biener
2015-10-30  9:56                                       ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-30 15:19                                         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-31 17:39                                           ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-31 17:58                                             ` Richard Biener
2015-11-03 10:26                                               ` Eric Botcazou
2015-11-03 11:39                                                 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-02  9:30                                             ` Andreas Schwab
2015-11-03  8:43                                               ` Eric Botcazou
2015-11-04  7:23                                                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-11-04  8:20                                                   ` Eric Botcazou
2015-11-04 16:50                                                     ` Jan Hubicka
2015-11-05 13:49                                                       ` Richard Biener
2015-10-21  4:42                           ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-21  8:54                             ` Richard Biener
2015-10-21 11:24                             ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-23  5:22                             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-23  9:14                               ` Richard Biener
2015-10-15 16:59   ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc1X4cDecZ0monVpxXSQ_ywu9anLRNBN9Ay4xx5_tLXtJw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).