From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: VEC_COND_EXPR optimizations
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:59:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1anmRvh4zNeesCyCLmzh_2LDiAhTCVrW1HP0c0wMUHnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mpt1rkrc0hj.fsf@arm.com>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:50 PM Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> writes:
> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> writes:
> >>> +/* (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e) --> c ? (a op d) : (b op e) */
> >>> + (simplify
> >>> + (op (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2) (vec_cond:s @0 @3 @4))
> >>> + (with
> >>> + {
> >>> + tree rhs1, rhs2 = NULL;
> >>> + rhs1 = fold_binary (op, type, @1, @3);
> >>> + if (rhs1 && is_gimple_val (rhs1))
> >>> + rhs2 = fold_binary (op, type, @2, @4);
> >>> + }
> >>> + (if (rhs2 && is_gimple_val (rhs2))
> >>> + (vec_cond @0 { rhs1; } { rhs2; })))))
> >>> +#endif
> >>
> >> This one looks dangerous for potentially-trapping ops.
> >
> > I would expect the operation not to be folded if it can trap. Is that too
> > optimistic?
>
> Not sure TBH. I was thinking of “trapping” in the sense of raising
> an IEEE exception, rather than in the could-throw/must-end-bb sense.
> I thought match.pd applied to things like FP addition as normal and
> it was up to individual patterns to check the appropriate properties.
I think it can be indeed defered to the simplification of (op @0 @2)
because that would be invalid if it removes a IEEE exception.
The VEC_COND_EXPR itself cannot trap.
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-30 7:49 Marc Glisse
2020-07-31 11:18 ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-31 11:38 ` Marc Glisse
2020-07-31 11:43 ` Richard Biener
2020-07-31 11:57 ` Marc Glisse
2020-07-31 12:50 ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-31 12:59 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2020-07-31 13:01 ` Marc Glisse
2020-07-31 13:13 ` Marc Glisse
2020-07-31 11:35 ` Richard Biener
2020-07-31 11:39 ` Richard Biener
2020-07-31 11:47 ` Richard Biener
2020-07-31 12:08 ` Richard Biener
2020-07-31 12:12 ` Marc Glisse
2020-08-05 13:32 ` VEC_COND_EXPR optimizations v2 Marc Glisse
2020-08-05 14:24 ` Richard Biener
2020-08-06 8:17 ` Christophe Lyon
2020-08-06 9:05 ` Marc Glisse
2020-08-06 11:25 ` Christophe Lyon
2020-08-06 11:42 ` Marc Glisse
2020-08-06 12:00 ` Christophe Lyon
2020-08-06 18:07 ` Marc Glisse
2020-08-07 6:38 ` Richard Biener
2020-08-07 8:33 ` Marc Glisse
2020-08-07 8:47 ` Richard Biener
2020-08-07 12:15 ` Marc Glisse
2020-08-07 13:04 ` Richard Biener
2020-08-06 10:29 ` Richard Biener
2020-08-06 11:11 ` Marc Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFiYyc1anmRvh4zNeesCyCLmzh_2LDiAhTCVrW1HP0c0wMUHnA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=marc.glisse@inria.fr \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).