From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEEF3858C50 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:09:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3CEEF3858C50 Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id gb36so12268230ejc.10 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 01:09:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=HtGJGUOqZQvkJmP+Ld4W53d73ssmiz9Z3M620OwXbyg=; b=ZJNpczmhz+CaPuTnc59gGWzcztwCNTF5+tROLAFyXwCBB7L3DKI837To9/6rgCxUrV tyEAq5Q9Cqm1iVhKPimode1UK/H0gF1DrvaNeGxE2hx8+PGBS7zaEQ1m5yhUuTTlYACf qIounUbpQHF7dkIxOv2/cFTX78wN5A4JOe/cnOkRvmUdTt5UL7i1mJoKNm/WrcvA0Qwa ipI/QJkr8tXmnrTXbqJkVIwfnRQByibWs9Iopc93O1RZ2dPKlHcueZoL+Nw2QNwprbw+ NeB47o92O+rBmrXYm73TSZkXtLzpDMHR61kEf16kDsvgvJZPj2pCN9JfDB+cPs+sh5v3 GCjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2XpzUSUSwF4UggXmw9ls6CMH+0qgc4Kd/vU7ifFl+c0NrgCd01 +2qddYJ9RddAtbxxZ54rSPOBzXIFBXOldFUKtJw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6YX6geUEOnnW4I+l/+b/u0IkyIl9yeYNaal0Smr/SkGki4P1xS9jHpmrFENKlBV0cBAwtiveOBM6WCGaQixbc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e29:b0:730:9d82:5113 with SMTP id hp41-20020a1709073e2900b007309d825113mr9967011ejc.29.1660550969141; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 01:09:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9fe90514-fa6c-2634-91e4-0de7e3422dbd@linux.ibm.com> <34fbf138-b3bb-77f3-7521-561293adc6ed@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <34fbf138-b3bb-77f3-7521-561293adc6ed@linux.ibm.com> From: Richard Biener Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Don't allow vect_emulated_vector_p type in vectorizable_call [PR106322] To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: Richard Sandiford , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:09:32 -0000 On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:00 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Hi Richi, > > >> > >> Yes, but you just missed the RC for 12.2 so please wait until after GCC 12.2 > >> is released and the branch is open again. The testcase looks mightly > >> complicated > >> so fallout there might be well possible as well ;) I suppose it wasn't possible > >> to craft a simple C testcase after the analysis? > > > > Thanks for the hints! Let me give it a try next week and get back to you then. > > > > As you suggested, I constructed one C testcase which has been verified on both i386 > and ppc64 (failed w/o the patch while passed w/ that). > > Is this attached patch ok for trunk? And also ok for all release branches after a > week or so (also after frozen time)? Yes. Thanks, Richard. > BR, > Kewen