Re: [gcc-7-arm] Backport -moutline-atomics flag

[Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:59 PM Pop, Sebastian <spop@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Richard for your recommendations.
> I am still discussing with Kyrill about a good name for the branch.
> Once we agree on a name we will commit the patches to that branch.

Any update here?  Are those patches in production at Amazon?
I now see refs/vendors/AWS/heads/Arm64/gcc-7-branch

Thanks,
Richard.

> Sebastian
>
> On 9/24/20, 4:10 AM, "Richard Biener" <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:38 AM Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches
>     <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > the attached patches are back-porting the flag -moutline-atomics to the gcc-7-arm vendor branch.
>     > The flag enables a very important performance optimization for N1-neoverse processors.
>     > The patches pass bootstrap and make check on Graviton2 aarch64-linux.
>     >
>     > Ok to commit to the gcc-7-arm vendor branch?
>
>     Given the branch doesn't exist yet can you eventually push this series to
>     a user branch (or a amazon vendor branch)?
>
>     You failed to CC arm folks so your mail might have been lost in the noise.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Richard.
>
>     > Thanks,
>     > Sebastian
>     >
>