From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Lawrence Crowl <crowl@googlers.com>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Unified debug dump function names.
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2=Fe9JJ3Wog3XG4B5gPUO9_n6qP_L6wd-FZuDm4hpQxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqM8fYMya8O3=QEWkFp2+YHt7xUcx=C9kwSwgpoL-XmjyzDgQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Lawrence Crowl <crowl@googlers.com> wrote:
> On 3/25/13, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You add a not used new interface. What for?
>
> So that people can use it.
>
>> For use from gdb only?
>
> No, for use from both gdb and internally. It is often that folks add
> dumps in various places while developing/debugging. These functions
> support that effort without having to hunt down the name.
But having both interfaces is bad. As you are unconditionally "dumping"
to stderr using debug () is correct. Sorry that I don't follow each and every
proposal - nobody follows up my proposals either.
The dump_ namespace is claimed by dumping to dumpfiles and diagnostics.
>> In which case it should be debug (), not dump ().
>
> I will use whatever name you wish, but I would have preferred that
> we addressed naming issues when we published the plan, not after
> I've done the implementation. What name do you wish?
debug ().
And I'd like you to remove the alternate debug_ interface that is obsoleted
by the overloads.
Btw, the overloading will provide extra headache to one of the most used
ways to the debug_ routines:
(gdb) call debug_tree (fndecl)
<function_decl 0x7ffff6e1b900 foo
type <function_type 0x7ffff6d28c78
type <integer_type 0x7ffff6d175e8 int public SI
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a0c0 constant 32>
unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a0e0 constant 4>
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type
0x7ffff6d175e8 precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a060
-2147483648> max <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a080 2147483647>
...
(gdb) call debug_tree (0x7ffff6d175e8)
Cannot resolve function debug_tree to any overloaded instance
(gdb) call debug_tree<tab><tab>
debug_tree(tree_node*)
debug_tree_chain(tree_node*)
debug_tree_chain(tree_node*)::__FUNCTION__
debug_tree_ssa()
debug_tree_ssa_stats()
<aha! (ok, I know this one is 'tree')>
(gdb) call debug_tree ((tree_node*)0x7ffff6d175e8)
<integer_type 0x7ffff6d175e8 int public SI
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a0c0 type <integer_type 0x7ffff6d170a8
bitsizetype> constant 32>
unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a0e0 type <integer_type
0x7ffff6d17000 sizetype> constant 4>
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff6d175e8
precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a060 -2147483648> max
<integer_cst 0x7ffff6d1a080 2147483647>
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff6d1f2a0>>
but with debug () having overloads to each and every thing we'd ever want to
debug the list of possible types I have to cast that literal address I
cut&pasted
will be endless.
Any suggestion on how to improve this situation? Yes, it's already
bad as with typing debug_tree I know it's a tree I am interested in and
(gdb) call debug_<tab><tab>
... endless list of functions and overloads ...
is probably as useless as
(gdb) call debug<tab><tab>
is after your patch.
Thanks,
Richard.
> --
> Lawrence Crowl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-23 22:31 Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-25 9:25 ` Richard Biener
2013-03-25 17:20 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-26 9:25 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2013-03-26 18:20 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-26 23:50 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-27 9:26 ` Richard Biener
2013-03-27 16:15 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-28 9:25 ` Richard Biener
2013-03-29 5:54 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-25 13:45 ` Tom Tromey
2013-03-25 17:25 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-03-25 17:59 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc2=Fe9JJ3Wog3XG4B5gPUO9_n6qP_L6wd-FZuDm4hpQxQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=crowl@googlers.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).