From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102680 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2018 09:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102662 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2018 09:08:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:850 X-HELO: mail-lj1-f169.google.com Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f169.google.com) (209.85.208.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:08:45 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id e5-v6so19682022lja.4 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 01:08:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3VGzWZ1JNbNn3jL17p5XiPkM/8rk+20mG0xdZ201/7k=; b=Ux4Lr4B8qZau2WsgB+FolW/9V4wV9JlCWZ/LmJqgXwj0vac9gG9i0EDykdiiDzmqQi NACnkJBebl7n97slcnSXVySMyUnTfSQIB3Gq2wQpnZ0cMpIjfO8izUd0nyUl0MF0WAhi tWI/Y9FrA67rJ0JoWx6R65Vthkjmfy3r4uFtEtoGHIxNp8srjdeoQMxeHBTAXDb4SOj2 dGU/HSRSujWzE2SU0U6WeVtza1LYZ90u7V2D8w/e7Y3rw6q/i9DQSEjvxGBzr2rLEwIa NvldBA4E8wGumZvEWTIGog+d9OMCaDsQelk59RNtNJYfmRy3Lm09ITTI412KZM54ESnD 7AaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Richard Biener Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626 To: Umesh Kalappa Cc: GCC Patches , lokeshjanghel91@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg01431.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 9:07 AM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Thank you Richard, > > Made the required changes ,ok to commit ? Can you attach the adjusted patch? Thanks, Richard. > Thank you > ~Umesh > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:02 PM Richard Biener > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:02 AM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The attached patch (pr85667.patch) fixes the subjected issue . > > > we tested on x86_64(linux and windows both) and no regress found . > > > > > > ok to commit ? > > > > I wonder if you can turn the testcase into a dg-run one, making the > > functions noinline/noipa and check the correct values are returned. > > > > Richard. > > > > > Thank you > > > ~Umesh