From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FCFC3846473 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 06:52:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6FCFC3846473 Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id f14so13871757qkm.0 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 23:52:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ck9LMjOco7heQLsfAAO2c37qwMcqe6aei3VNObu4BT8=; b=2VwYAFpShO7/+We5fAZC0t1luqSil3w5P9neYT1rXiXwzvVplBS5JbpGbIXVF8t4ae htjHkNiH2icauqMG/P0dG+38ltVKsDEUQlTxRDyvwXaFPbb8vbPal4b3E9WBv32qYE03 orox3570g/ef0Mo2ro9xeljHwX1oI/sTYx53o49eg6j36jUry4zsP2IfYzhf5U2Z1/eG YHXHyE3sfd5LY/06MfQaJTGupt5jv9ErDEVI0/5WAvYRE1oqiw5lJGSdF2UNCWgDKRji Yw2/3sDyAx7hl2fEQZO2kzE8ggslnu/74aU5Cl6Fg2SdpzmJ2f4D2sKKmUracp+Ynwkj QuKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9nVqNYvo+WTuHDkojVa7I8OuIv6dUV2cz3qBebJLnywh7DNnYx U9UEFCPjjHsY+9x9P74CNPxIxTTXySKlfXkWFY0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1txjr7QCM/h1kALFIuOdTXm57m4nBjdA04gs7CryTw/mXNecBdZMBdp9FkKRafa1TZI2VqAxoh7lpZ+4BorKF8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1919:b0:6af:20e6:346c with SMTP id bj25-20020a05620a191900b006af20e6346cmr5156941qkb.627.1656571974797; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 23:52:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220628133952.68218-1-kito.cheng@sifive.com> In-Reply-To: From: Richard Biener Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:52:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite/102690: Only check warning for lp64 in Warray-bounds-16.C To: Kito Cheng Cc: Richard Biener , Martin Sebor , GCC Patches , Kito Cheng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 06:52:57 -0000 On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:17 AM Kito Cheng wrote: > > Committed to trunk, thanks :) > > Is it OK for gcc-11 and gcc-12 branches? Yes, if the same failure is corrected there > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:00 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Kito Cheng wrote: > > > > > That warning won't happen on ilp32 targets, seems like Andrew Pinski > > > already mention that[1] before. > > > > > > Verified on riscv32-unknown-elf and riscv64-unknown-elf. > > > > > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92879#c1 > > > > OK > > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > > > PR testsuite/102690 > > > * g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C: XFAIL only on lp64 for the > > > warning. > > > --- > > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C > > > index 89cbadb91c7..45a14b19ea3 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C > > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C > > > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct S > > > p = (int*) new unsigned char [sizeof (int) * m]; > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) > > > - new (p + i) int (); /* { dg-bogus "bounds" "pr102690" { xfail *-*-* } } */ > > > + new (p + i) int (); /* { dg-bogus "bounds" "pr102690" { xfail lp64 } } */ > > > } > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Richard Biener > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstra