public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Hafiz Abid Qadeer <abid_qadeer@mentor.com>
Cc: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
	Abid Qadeer <abidh@codesourcery.com>,
	 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [DWARF] Fix hierarchy of debug information for offload kernels.
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:45:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2TLE4hX-UagHi07Ry42WWnGKpYvaeJK_txx1tvd6KNwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adcc49f7-cc72-fd9b-a7ea-b409de3b68f8@mentor.com>

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:23 PM Hafiz Abid Qadeer
<abid_qadeer@mentor.com> wrote:
>
> On 15/07/2021 13:09, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:35 PM Hafiz Abid Qadeer
> > <abid_qadeer@mentor.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15/07/2021 11:33, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Note that the "parent" should be abstract but I don't think dwarf has a
> >>>> way to express a fully abstract parent of a concrete instance child - or
> >>>> at least how GCC expresses this causes consumers to "misinterpret"
> >>>> that.  I wonder if adding a DW_AT_declaration to the late DWARF
> >>>> emitted "parent" would fix things as well here?
> >>>
> >>> (I suppose not, Abid?)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, adding DW_AT_declaration does not fix the problem.
> >
> > Does emitting
> >
> > DW_TAG_compile_unit
> >   DW_AT_name    ("<artificial>")
> >
> >   DW_TAG_subprogram // notional parent function (foo) with no code range
> >     DW_AT_declaration 1
> > a:    DW_TAG_subprogram // offload function foo._omp_fn.0
> >       DW_AT_declaration 1
> >
> >   DW_TAG_subprogram // offload function
> >   DW_AT_abstract_origin a
> > ...
> >
> > do the trick?  The following would do this, flattening function definitions
> > for the concrete copies:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> > index 82783c4968b..a9c8bc43e88 100644
> > --- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> > +++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> > @@ -6076,6 +6076,11 @@ maybe_create_die_with_external_ref (tree decl)
> >    /* Peel types in the context stack.  */
> >    while (ctx && TYPE_P (ctx))
> >      ctx = TYPE_CONTEXT (ctx);
> > +  /* For functions peel the context up to namespace/TU scope.  The abstract
> > +     copies reveal the true nesting.  */
> > +  if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
> > +    while (ctx && TREE_CODE (ctx) == FUNCTION_DECL)
> > +      ctx = DECL_CONTEXT (ctx);
> >    /* Likewise namespaces in case we do not want to emit DIEs for them.  */
> >    if (debug_info_level <= DINFO_LEVEL_TERSE)
> >      while (ctx && TREE_CODE (ctx) == NAMESPACE_DECL)
> > @@ -6099,8 +6104,7 @@ maybe_create_die_with_external_ref (tree decl)
> >         /* Leave function local entities parent determination to when
> >            we process scope vars.  */
> >         ;
> > -      else
> > -       parent = lookup_decl_die (ctx);
> > +      parent = lookup_decl_die (ctx);
> >      }
> >    else
> >      /* In some cases the FEs fail to set DECL_CONTEXT properly.
> >
>
> Thanks. This solves the problem. Only the first hunk was required. Second hunk
> actually causes an ICE when TREE_CODE (ctx) == BLOCK.
> OK to commit the attached patch?

I think we need to merge the TYPE_P peeling and FUNCTION_DECL peeling into
one loop since I suppose we can have a nested function in class scope.
So sth like

diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index 82783c4968b..61228410b51 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
@@ -6073,8 +6073,12 @@ maybe_create_die_with_external_ref (tree decl)
     }
   else
     ctx = DECL_CONTEXT (decl);
-  /* Peel types in the context stack.  */
-  while (ctx && TYPE_P (ctx))
+  /* Peel types in the context stack.  For functions peel the context up
+     to namespace/TU scope.  The abstract copies reveal the true nesting.  */
+  while (ctx
+        && (TYPE_P (ctx)
+            || (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
+                && TREE_CODE (ctx) == FUNCTION_DECL)))
     ctx = TYPE_CONTEXT (ctx);
   /* Likewise namespaces in case we do not want to emit DIEs for them.  */
   if (debug_info_level <= DINFO_LEVEL_TERSE)

if that works it's OK.  Can you run it on the gdb testsuite with -flto added
as well please (you need to do before/after comparison since IIRC adding
-flto will add a few fails).

Thanks,
Richard.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-01 15:16 Hafiz Abid Qadeer
2021-07-02  7:15 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 10:33   ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-07-15 10:35     ` Hafiz Abid Qadeer
2021-07-15 12:09       ` Richard Biener
2021-07-16 20:23         ` Hafiz Abid Qadeer
2021-07-19 10:45           ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-07-19 16:13             ` Hafiz Abid Qadeer
2021-07-19 16:41               ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21 17:55                 ` Hafiz Abid Qadeer
2021-07-22 11:43                   ` Richard Biener
2021-07-22 11:48                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-07-22 11:52                       ` Richard Biener
2021-07-26 21:34                         ` Hafiz Abid Qadeer
2021-07-27  8:39                           ` Richard Biener
2021-07-27 12:37                             ` Hafiz Abid Qadeer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc2TLE4hX-UagHi07Ry42WWnGKpYvaeJK_txx1tvd6KNwg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=abid_qadeer@mentor.com \
    --cc=abidh@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).