From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-454513-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 87771 invoked by alias); 26 May 2017 11:15:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86937 invoked by uid 89); 26 May 2017 11:15:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f52.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f52.google.com) (209.85.218.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:15:54 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b204so8741648oii.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=nOYrNObCggkuoIdLwNadqUh7xf9EFPGS4875cbtkBog=;        b=laS7II5OnEJmYlNRZs4g9X4F89Evma2Xdad+VJRpOMmXwTS6PuiiZQEs/g3QtX1pc2         jEmgWHzhkj5uHF0a2IL/o+2+laTybO0YV/VNTfuPrOAlct9wwEZItdDC3dotNTVE3WwK         hwwHfpBKzf2SSTOCpWxPqjNI/wPx+M5dOibKTFXJ3NZvvx/kGFYMFNjMy2YpHigpdcQj         vfVPLg6k9EUL2EhRFBZynFcuhTVmND9+6IwknZjj41A/yLkXedb2YtfFvPWOYnzPXI8x         t1TwvKUxkdDM2IIeUzGFLTYAD2JpbCPF9zG/R11Vm5FnE0uFDZ3sVUcIxCmzMY2AF4ch         Ribw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCWGwfd5sq3fWm/f9Gu4wQzSgeODM7VK/FXAyY6Uhva14VPBeKX	lNpfdw66LyZBcAT1eveSRQwOlPhe3B0r
X-Received: by 10.157.28.135 with SMTP id l7mr615997ota.87.1495797356887; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.51.83 with HTTP; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0802MB2176425F7CDF0ED8B680D7DFE7F90@VI1PR0802MB2176.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR0802MB2176425F7CDF0ED8B680D7DFE7F90@VI1PR0802MB2176.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2Uf4nQB+G6ajkofFgLhnDBKDWHMFgYJtv-eviNNsAM1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC][2/6]Factor out code pruning runtime alias checks
To: Bin Cheng <Bin.Cheng@arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg02023.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Bin Cheng <Bin.Cheng@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> This is the second patch in the set, it factors out code pruning runtime alias
> checks from file tree-vect-data-refs.c to tree-data-ref.c.  It also introduces
> new interface prune_runtime_alias_test_list so that we can use it in pass like
> loop distribution.
> Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and AArch64, is it OK?

Ok.
Richard.

> Thanks,
> bin
> 2017-05-22  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>
>
>         * tree-vect-data-refs.c (Operator==, comp_dr_with_seg_len_pair):
>         Move from ...
>         * tree-data-ref.c (Operator==, comp_dr_with_seg_len_pair): To here.
>         * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_prune_runtime_alias_test_list): Factor
>         out code pruning runtime alias checks.
>         * tree-data-ref.c (prune_runtime_alias_test_list): New function
>         factored out from above.
>         * tree-vectorizer.h (struct dr_with_seg_len, dr_with_seg_len_pair_t):
>         Move from ...
>         * tree-data-ref.h (struct dr_with_seg_len, dr_with_seg_len_pair_t):
>         ... to here.
>         (prune_runtime_alias_test_list): New decalaration.