From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-503691-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 120175 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2019 14:23:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120002 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jun 2019 14:23:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-lj1-f170.google.com
Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f170.google.com) (209.85.208.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:23:49 +0000
Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id k18so16453589ljc.11        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=NZ0iiQr7Z5MoKEOl4c3hO05ffsigVuVuIiSH8eE4B2M=;        b=BT2P+FJ5v/22edtcXVFhdpMSt3aRXVtw280w355Jgr7cqfRy5pVxYjO6wDNAxucv9W         0edrqYAs2TE++puoc0RtjQiL1FFIBq8bKnG18X+VgiXU3oSF2uwrnBPsTo6I9SnHGQID         37ZBf2zgHG6Yp8+Uc1XK0ybt2H9AOEvyhhaiMiOZNv8IdlEPTVK1BXqHfoz5Z/hAd6g/         pnqAa4sR/G3iuAsTH9UFGykN2gAjxoYISJ8VJqW0FSTkp/AxNP6QrO8/kYbT6v0T8W9x         mheZzTDN59bmvYeiS2xqZYhLruoSyg0ZksZWVeYMyMROZRvTrEdGnoZVaOEuip4xvqyl         1Piw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <23ffca95-6492-e609-aebb-bbdd83b5185d@suse.cz> <32744d50-09fd-496c-e97e-9ec478d64ec4@suse.cz> <e48993c5-bb85-ddf4-2c6f-89145bf4a2dd@redhat.com> <492d87a7-0210-0df3-f484-f126baa6866c@suse.cz> <47fcf0aa-4b89-5354-1b59-4e6c623f5c3a@suse.cz> <be20f9e6-0de7-58f2-e668-62727274fb4e@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1oRW5_qrQ3=DDK5SqD7XhKo7X8-AApXyKgQ2xs3mWgcg@mail.gmail.com> <da052a95-6d5d-2b6c-ffce-d3f92a4ae1ac@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc2DCes7n=S2Hr1Bi0D4k-y75v3Z3cjtJZtjZtZtoySe_g@mail.gmail.com> <999abc46-57c7-ccf9-b0c9-baf4c0686b16@suse.cz> <f1d9b59d-1833-7319-6d9f-c4f333c0ebb3@redhat.com> <4faef430-49cf-13bc-4bb2-858a72668ae6@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc27WS_FzbLVkxXqZpAM9pt3DPNfF8zJpQ6zVYPo_SHYng@mail.gmail.com> <243b87c2-91e0-063d-0682-de232656beaa@suse.cz> <CAKOQZ8zgRK5atPtKC-E0SD6c10KXgn=fO7b+tV+p=GKxoSe4gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2sVwtXn=S+8E+iOdAJ+1Tn3HBeRG9iOLmd25031MMdYQ@mail.gmail.com> <4e546ac2-bb41-42bd-6b12-72e4f5c08d5d@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc0doL96fox94Ph7B2CSDcCNvvVDaLaDduPqgV_36MCxBg@mail.gmail.com> <aa71523d-187f-4ade-ed9b-626225da60e5@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <aa71523d-187f-4ade-ed9b-626225da60e5@suse.cz>
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2WogDPaUVfxJATPaDzrg5dvS_KyK_qofk4muwxYdXuVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Sanitize equals and hash functions in hash-tables.
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, 	Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, 	Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>, Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg01558.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:25 PM Martin Li=C5=A1ka <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 4:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > You still get one instance in each TU ...
>
> Right, fixed in attached patch.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Martin