From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29839 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2012 13:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 29234 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2012 13:11:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:11:13 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id vb8so10462974obc.20 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:11:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.11.136 with SMTP id q8mr6930475oeb.10.1353849073304; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:11:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.95.202 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:11:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121115215319.AE4ACC0916@torture.tor.corp.google.com> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25] From: Richard Biener To: Diego Novillo Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02031.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: >>> I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please >>> CC me on any problems that you think may be related to this rewrite. >> >> That seems to have trigged some bug in gcc-4.4-era. See >> PR55381. There are a lot of suspicious warnings from vec.h. >> It smells a bit like a host gcc bug, but I'll have to find a >> newer version where it builds to confirm. (If so, "hopefully" >> it's as "simple" as upping the minimum host gcc version or >> blacklisting gcc-4.4.x.) > > Yeah, I got those warnings in my sparc and hppa builds, but they are > harmless. Strictly speaking offsetof cannot be applied to non-PODs. > The only thing that makes that class non-POD is the protected > attribute, but that does not alter the physical layout. So the > compiler is emitting a harmless warning (newer versions have > tightened the check to warn when you are using offsetof on a non-base > class). Doesn't that mean that a non-GCC host compiler might fail to build 4.8 during stage1? Richard. > My cris-elf builds worked fine, but config-list.mk only builds stage > 1, it does not build libgfortran. Can you give me instructions on how > to build your target on my x86 workstation? > > > Thanks. Diego.