public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	 Hongtao Liu <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] Add loop masking support for x86
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:45:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2YyTZ-4+ab8oPAN_9z3OF52qenRwpf=Pifkm6r8r8NSA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73rrp0p-859r-oq2n-pss7-6744807s3qr5@fhfr.qr>

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs.  So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
> you can now enable masked vectorized epilogues (=1) or fully
> masked vector loops (=2).
>
> What's missing is using a scalar IV for the loop control
> (but in principle AVX512 can use the mask here - just the patch
> doesn't seem to work for AVX512 yet for some reason - likely
> expand_vec_cond_expr_p doesn't work there).  What's also missing
> is providing more support for predicated operations in the case
> of reductions either via VEC_COND_EXPRs or via implementing
> some of the .COND_{ADD,SUB,MUL...} internal functions as mapping
> to masked AVX512 operations.
>
> For AVX2 and
>
> int foo (unsigned *a, unsigned * __restrict b, int n)
> {
>   unsigned sum = 1;
>   for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
>     b[i] += a[i];
>   return sum;
> }
>
> we get
>
> .L3:
>         vpmaskmovd      (%rsi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm3
>         vpmaskmovd      (%rdi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm1
>         addl    $8, %edx
>         vpaddd  %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
>         vpmaskmovd      %ymm1, %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax)
>         vmovd   %edx, %xmm1
>         vpsubd  %ymm15, %ymm2, %ymm0
>         addq    $32, %rax
>         vpbroadcastd    %xmm1, %ymm1
>         vpaddd  %ymm4, %ymm1, %ymm1
>         vpsubd  %ymm15, %ymm1, %ymm1
>         vpcmpgtd        %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
>         vptest  %ymm0, %ymm0
>         jne     .L3
>
> for the fully masked loop body and for the masked epilogue
> we see
>
> .L4:
>         vmovdqu (%rsi,%rax), %ymm3
>         vpaddd  (%rdi,%rax), %ymm3, %ymm0
>         vmovdqu %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax)
>         addq    $32, %rax
>         cmpq    %rax, %rcx
>         jne     .L4
>         movl    %edx, %eax
>         andl    $-8, %eax
>         testb   $7, %dl
>         je      .L11
> .L3:
>         subl    %eax, %edx
>         vmovdqa .LC0(%rip), %ymm1
>         salq    $2, %rax
>         vmovd   %edx, %xmm0
>         movl    $-2147483648, %edx
>         addq    %rax, %rsi
>         vmovd   %edx, %xmm15
>         vpbroadcastd    %xmm0, %ymm0
>         vpbroadcastd    %xmm15, %ymm15
>         vpsubd  %ymm15, %ymm1, %ymm1
>         vpsubd  %ymm15, %ymm0, %ymm0
>         vpcmpgtd        %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
>         vpmaskmovd      (%rsi), %ymm0, %ymm1
>         vpmaskmovd      (%rdi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm2
>         vpaddd  %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
>         vpmaskmovd      %ymm1, %ymm0, (%rsi)
> .L11:
>         vzeroupper
>
> compared to
>
> .L3:
>         movl    %edx, %r8d
>         subl    %eax, %r8d
>         leal    -1(%r8), %r9d
>         cmpl    $2, %r9d
>         jbe     .L6
>         leaq    (%rcx,%rax,4), %r9
>         vmovdqu (%rdi,%rax,4), %xmm2
>         movl    %r8d, %eax
>         andl    $-4, %eax
>         vpaddd  (%r9), %xmm2, %xmm0
>         addl    %eax, %esi
>         andl    $3, %r8d
>         vmovdqu %xmm0, (%r9)
>         je      .L2
> .L6:
>         movslq  %esi, %r8
>         leaq    0(,%r8,4), %rax
>         movl    (%rdi,%r8,4), %r8d
>         addl    %r8d, (%rcx,%rax)
>         leal    1(%rsi), %r8d
>         cmpl    %r8d, %edx
>         jle     .L2
>         addl    $2, %esi
>         movl    4(%rdi,%rax), %r8d
>         addl    %r8d, 4(%rcx,%rax)
>         cmpl    %esi, %edx
>         jle     .L2
>         movl    8(%rdi,%rax), %edx
>         addl    %edx, 8(%rcx,%rax)
> .L2:
>
> I'm giving this a little testing right now but will dig on why
> I don't get masked loops when AVX512 is enabled.

Ah, a simple thinko - rgroup_controls vectypes seem to be
always VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P and thus we can
use expand_vec_cmp_expr_p.  The AVX512 fully masked
loop then looks like

.L3:
        vmovdqu32       (%rsi,%rax,4), %ymm2{%k1}
        vmovdqu32       (%rdi,%rax,4), %ymm1{%k1}
        vpaddd  %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm0
        vmovdqu32       %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax,4){%k1}
        addq    $8, %rax
        vpbroadcastd    %eax, %ymm0
        vpaddd  %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
        vpcmpud $6, %ymm0, %ymm3, %k1
        kortestb        %k1, %k1
        jne     .L3

I guess for x86 it's not worth preserving the VEC_COND_EXPR
mask generation but other archs may not provide all required vec_cmp
expanders.

Richard.

> Still comments are appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
> 2021-07-15  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
>
>         * tree-vect-stmts.c (can_produce_all_loop_masks_p): We
>         also can produce masks with VEC_COND_EXPRs.
>         * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_gen_while): Generate the mask
>         with a VEC_COND_EXPR in case WHILE_ULT is not supported.
> ---
>  gcc/tree-vect-loop.c  |  8 ++++++-
>  gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> index fc3dab0d143..2214ed11dfb 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> @@ -975,11 +975,17 @@ can_produce_all_loop_masks_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, tree cmp_type)
>  {
>    rgroup_controls *rgm;
>    unsigned int i;
> +  tree cmp_vectype;
>    FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo), i, rgm)
>      if (rgm->type != NULL_TREE
>         && !direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_WHILE_ULT,
>                                             cmp_type, rgm->type,
> -                                           OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> +                                           OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED)
> +       && ((cmp_vectype
> +              = truth_type_for (build_vector_type
> +                                (cmp_type, TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (rgm->type)))),
> +           true)
> +       && !expand_vec_cond_expr_p (rgm->type, cmp_vectype, LT_EXPR))
>        return false;
>    return true;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> index 6a25d661800..216986399b1 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> @@ -12007,16 +12007,46 @@ vect_gen_while (gimple_seq *seq, tree mask_type, tree start_index,
>                 tree end_index, const char *name)
>  {
>    tree cmp_type = TREE_TYPE (start_index);
> -  gcc_checking_assert (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_WHILE_ULT,
> -                                                      cmp_type, mask_type,
> -                                                      OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED));
> -  gcall *call = gimple_build_call_internal (IFN_WHILE_ULT, 3,
> -                                           start_index, end_index,
> -                                           build_zero_cst (mask_type));
> -  tree tmp = make_temp_ssa_name (mask_type, NULL, name);
> -  gimple_call_set_lhs (call, tmp);
> -  gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, call);
> -  return tmp;
> +  if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_WHILE_ULT,
> +                                     cmp_type, mask_type,
> +                                     OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> +    {
> +      gcall *call = gimple_build_call_internal (IFN_WHILE_ULT, 3,
> +                                               start_index, end_index,
> +                                               build_zero_cst (mask_type));
> +      tree tmp = make_temp_ssa_name (mask_type, NULL, name);
> +      gimple_call_set_lhs (call, tmp);
> +      gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, call);
> +      return tmp;
> +    }
> +  else
> +    {
> +      /* Generate
> +          _1 = { start_index, start_index, ... };
> +          _2 = { end_index, end_index, ... };
> +          _3 = _1 + { 0, 1, 2 ... };
> +          _4 = _3 < _2;
> +          _5 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_4, { -1, -1, ... } : { 0, 0, ... }>;   */
> +      tree cvectype = build_vector_type (cmp_type,
> +                                        TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (mask_type));
> +      tree si = make_ssa_name (cvectype);
> +      gassign *ass = gimple_build_assign
> +                       (si, build_vector_from_val (cvectype, start_index));
> +      gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, ass);
> +      tree ei = make_ssa_name (cvectype);
> +      ass = gimple_build_assign (ei,
> +                                build_vector_from_val (cvectype, end_index));
> +      gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, ass);
> +      tree incr = build_vec_series (cvectype, build_zero_cst (cmp_type),
> +                                   build_one_cst (cmp_type));
> +      si = gimple_build (seq, PLUS_EXPR, cvectype, si, incr);
> +      tree cmp = gimple_build (seq, LT_EXPR, truth_type_for (cvectype),
> +                              si, ei);
> +      tree mask = gimple_build (seq, VEC_COND_EXPR, mask_type, cmp,
> +                               build_all_ones_cst (mask_type),
> +                               build_zero_cst (mask_type));
> +      return mask;
> +    }
>  }
>
>  /* Generate a vector mask of type MASK_TYPE for which index I is false iff
> --
> 2.26.2

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-15 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-15 10:30 Richard Biener
2021-07-15 10:45 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-07-15 11:20   ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-15 11:48     ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 14:57       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-15 15:15         ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 15:31           ` Richard Biener
2021-07-16  9:11             ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20  4:20               ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-20  7:38                 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20 11:07                   ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-20 11:09                     ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21  7:57                   ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-21  8:16                     ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21  9:38                       ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-21 10:13                         ` Richard Biener
2021-07-16  1:46       ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-16  6:09         ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 13:49 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-15 13:54   ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20 13:48   ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21  6:17     ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFiYyc2YyTZ-4+ab8oPAN_9z3OF52qenRwpf=Pifkm6r8r8NSA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).