From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7135 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2018 14:53:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7124 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2018 14:53:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-lj1-f193.google.com Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f193.google.com) (209.85.208.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:53:49 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id l19-v6so2751213ljb.0 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:53:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xNLCai3BqMmucCmSRN7dN6l2zqDBrl9eUPRezTPTJ2s=; b=SeA4eTTH8mvfZxpySnrvs1CV/hQkDhUdslJMM+SlY2EWkZU9dsrAXBxCEIc23CY7DK GI/yhZVhho4c4bLFZ5PDoqKVE946FYgoJ0KqGxUuzdr6N9ILcnxbg1/n05BBC66rGu+K bPQwBEBGirzzrWgKCeH4Gx7+9eswgtSCgLJo4InjP4Kvx66f6pEe4TY96Z62fd/hVIXZ NfNM23Pco+bpeMcOoHOZge2cwbz3M2fPoxrTtqPuyHJCLzx6m8+E6o4yAy1rHkDyX16E KS4oiH03iN35JPheI7fz643Z3MJXN/qGQQWhG6f+Q8dFThu8N7HjCYM3Ccg+2OT5AKkL p3TQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6a2ea403-22c3-91f6-f826-29e186f21b91@suse.cz> <159a29c5-8f8b-4194-dbea-1c9bd414db3a@oracle.com> <7ed25f0a-10a8-3eca-c032-29e76054bfb6@suse.cz> <20180917105249.GA49438@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <15203968-8ae2-9da8-0c14-83ed1ebbb907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Richard Biener Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR86957 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: indu.bhagat@oracle.com, Martin Sebor , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg01669.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:10 PM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > On 9/27/18 12:14 PM, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > On 9/27/18 11:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:14 PM Indu Bhagat w= rote: > >>> > >>> Done. Attached is updated patch. > >>> > >>> Patch is tested on x86_64 > >> > >> You obviously did _not_ properly test the patch since it causes a > >> bunch of new testsuite > >> failures: > >> > >> FAIL: g++.dg/pr60518.C -std=3Dgnu++11 (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/pr60518.C -std=3Dgnu++14 (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/pr60518.C -std=3Dgnu++98 (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/dom-invalid.C -std=3Dgnu++11 (test for excess e= rrors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/dom-invalid.C -std=3Dgnu++14 (test for excess e= rrors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/dom-invalid.C -std=3Dgnu++98 (test for excess e= rrors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > >> -flto-partition=3Dnone line 23 p =3D=3D 40 > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O0 (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O1 (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O2 (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > >> -flto-partition=3Dnone (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > >> -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -O3 -g (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr59265.C -Os (test for excess errors) > >> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/morefunc.C compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFI= LE_USE > >> UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/tree-prof/morefunc.C execution, -fprofile-use > >> -D_PROFILE_USE > >> > >> and more. Please get up to speed with GCC development and testing req= uirements! > >> > >> Richard. > > > > I'll cook patch for it in order to remove the failures as soon as possi= ble. > > > > Martin > > > >> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> > >>> On 09/24/2018 09:37 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: > >>>> I would suggest to use the term "remove" or "delete" instead of > >>>> the informal "wipe out" when referring to removing files or their > >>>> contents. > >>>> > >>>> Martin > >>> > > > > There's tested patch that I made. It's tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Feel f= ree > to install it after approval. I'll be back on Monday. Patch is OK (and I installed it). Richard. > Martin