public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM zSystems: Fix function_ok_for_sibcall [PR106355]
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:59:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2iTE6HStioVzL8UJPVcZQWVrNcRy__rCCMc8BQ5fkwJw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817115044.1853371-1-stefansf@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:57 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via
Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> For a parameter with BLKmode we cannot use REG_NREGS in order to
> determine the number of consecutive registers.  Streamlined this with
> the implementation of s390_function_arg.
>
> Fix some indentation whitespace, too.
>
> Assuming bootstrap and regtest are ok for mainline and gcc-{10,11,12},

Note the GCC 12 branch is currently frozen.

Richard.

> ok to install for all of those?
>
> PR target/106355
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_call_saved_register_used): For a
>         parameter with BLKmode fix determining number of consecutive
>         registers.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gcc.target/s390/pr106355.h: Common code for new tests.
>         * gcc.target/s390/pr106355-1.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/s390/pr106355-2.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/s390/pr106355-3.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/config/s390/s390.cc                    | 47 +++++++++++-----------
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-1.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-2.c |  8 ++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-3.c |  8 ++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355.h   | 18 +++++++++
>  5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-1.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-2.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-3.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355.h
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc
> index 5aaf76a9490..85e5b2cb2a2 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc
> @@ -13712,36 +13712,37 @@ s390_call_saved_register_used (tree call_expr)
>        function_arg_info arg (TREE_TYPE (parameter), /*named=*/true);
>        apply_pass_by_reference_rules (&cum_v, arg);
>
> -       parm_rtx = s390_function_arg (cum, arg);
> +      parm_rtx = s390_function_arg (cum, arg);
>
> -       s390_function_arg_advance (cum, arg);
> +      s390_function_arg_advance (cum, arg);
>
> -       if (!parm_rtx)
> -        continue;
> -
> -       if (REG_P (parm_rtx))
> -        {
> -          for (reg = 0; reg < REG_NREGS (parm_rtx); reg++)
> -            if (!call_used_or_fixed_reg_p (reg + REGNO (parm_rtx)))
> -              return true;
> -        }
> +      if (!parm_rtx)
> +       continue;
>
> -       if (GET_CODE (parm_rtx) == PARALLEL)
> -        {
> -          int i;
> +      if (REG_P (parm_rtx))
> +       {
> +         int size = s390_function_arg_size (arg.mode, arg.type);
> +         int nregs = (size + UNITS_PER_LONG - 1) / UNITS_PER_LONG;
>
> -          for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (parm_rtx, 0); i++)
> -            {
> -              rtx r = XEXP (XVECEXP (parm_rtx, 0, i), 0);
> +         for (reg = 0; reg < nregs; reg++)
> +           if (!call_used_or_fixed_reg_p (reg + REGNO (parm_rtx)))
> +             return true;
> +       }
> +      else if (GET_CODE (parm_rtx) == PARALLEL)
> +       {
> +         int i;
>
> -              gcc_assert (REG_P (r));
> +         for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (parm_rtx, 0); i++)
> +           {
> +             rtx r = XEXP (XVECEXP (parm_rtx, 0, i), 0);
>
> -              for (reg = 0; reg < REG_NREGS (r); reg++)
> -                if (!call_used_or_fixed_reg_p (reg + REGNO (r)))
> -                  return true;
> -            }
> -        }
> +             gcc_assert (REG_P (r));
> +             gcc_assert (REG_NREGS (r) == 1);
>
> +             if (!call_used_or_fixed_reg_p (REGNO (r)))
> +               return true;
> +           }
> +       }
>      }
>    return false;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..1ec0f6b25ac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-foptimize-sibling-calls" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {brasl\t%r\d+,bar4} } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {brasl\t%r\d+,bar8} } } */
> +
> +/* Parameter E is passed in GPR 6 which is call-saved which prohibits
> +   sibling call optimization.  This must hold true also if the mode of the
> +   parameter is BLKmode.  */
> +
> +/* 4 byte */
> +
> +typedef struct
> +{
> +  char x;
> +  char y[3];
> +} t4;
> +
> +extern t4 e4;
> +
> +extern void bar4 (int a, int b, int c, int d, t4 e4);
> +
> +void foo4 (int a, int b, int c, int d)
> +{
> +  bar4 (a, b, c, d, e4);
> +}
> +
> +/* 8 byte */
> +
> +typedef struct
> +{
> +  short x;
> +  char y[6];
> +} t8;
> +
> +extern t8 e8;
> +
> +extern void bar8 (int a, int b, int c, int d, t8 e8);
> +
> +void foo8 (int a, int b, int c, int d)
> +{
> +  bar8 (a, b, c, d, e8);
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..ddbdba5d278
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { s390-*-* } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-foptimize-sibling-calls -mzarch" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {brasl\t%r\d+,bar} } } */
> +
> +/* This tests function s390_call_saved_register_used where
> +   GET_CODE (parm_rtx) == PARALLEL holds.  */
> +
> +#include "pr106355.h"
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..39daea44fc4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355-3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { s390-*-* } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-foptimize-sibling-calls -mesa" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {brasl\t%r\d+,bar} } } */
> +
> +/* This tests function s390_call_saved_register_used where
> +   REG_P (parm_rtx) and nregs == 2 holds.  */
> +
> +#include "pr106355.h"
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..362908e5913
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr106355.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* For the S/390 ABI parameter D is passed in GPR 5 and 6 and the latter is
> +   call-saved which prohibits sibling call optimization.  This must hold true
> +   also if the mode of the parameter is BLKmode.  */
> +
> +typedef struct
> +{
> +  short x;
> +  char y[6];
> +} t;
> +
> +extern t d;
> +
> +extern void bar (int a, int b, int c, t d);
> +
> +void foo (int a, int b, int c)
> +{
> +  bar (a, b, c, d);
> +}
> --
> 2.35.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17 11:50 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
2022-08-17 11:59 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2022-08-24 18:47 ` Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
2022-10-19  6:57 ` Andreas Krebbel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc2iTE6HStioVzL8UJPVcZQWVrNcRy__rCCMc8BQ5fkwJw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefansf@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).