public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2/8] vect: Remove duplicated check on reduction operand
@ 2024-06-16  7:22 Feng Xue OS
  2024-06-19 12:35 ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Feng Xue OS @ 2024-06-16  7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Biener; +Cc: gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]

In vectorizable_reduction, one check on a reduction operand via index could be
contained by another one check via pointer, so remove the former.

Thanks,
Feng

---
gcc/
	* tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorizable_reduction): Remove the duplicated
	check.
---
 gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index d9a2ad69484..6e8b3639daf 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -7815,11 +7815,9 @@ vectorizable_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
 			     "use not simple.\n");
 	  return false;
 	}
-      if (i == STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info))
-	continue;
 
-      /* For an IFN_COND_OP we might hit the reduction definition operand
-	 twice (once as definition, once as else).  */
+      /* Skip reduction operands, and for an IFN_COND_OP we might hit the
+	 reduction operand twice (once as definition, once as else).  */
       if (op.ops[i] == op.ops[STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info)])
 	continue;
 
-- 
2.17.1

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0002-vect-Remove-duplicated-check-on-reduction-operand.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name="0002-vect-Remove-duplicated-check-on-reduction-operand.patch", Size: 1295 bytes --]

From 5d2c22ad724856db12bf0ca568650f471447fa34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng Xue <fxue@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:08:56 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] vect: Remove duplicated check on reduction operand

In vectorizable_reduction, one check on a reduction operand via index could be
contained by another one check via pointer, so remove the former.

2024-06-16 Feng Xue <fxue@os.amperecomputing.com>

gcc/
	* tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorizable_reduction): Remove the duplicated
	check.
---
 gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index d9a2ad69484..6e8b3639daf 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -7815,11 +7815,9 @@ vectorizable_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
 			     "use not simple.\n");
 	  return false;
 	}
-      if (i == STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info))
-	continue;
 
-      /* For an IFN_COND_OP we might hit the reduction definition operand
-	 twice (once as definition, once as else).  */
+      /* Skip reduction operands, and for an IFN_COND_OP we might hit the
+	 reduction operand twice (once as definition, once as else).  */
       if (op.ops[i] == op.ops[STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info)])
 	continue;
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] vect: Remove duplicated check on reduction operand
  2024-06-16  7:22 [PATCH 2/8] vect: Remove duplicated check on reduction operand Feng Xue OS
@ 2024-06-19 12:35 ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2024-06-19 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Feng Xue OS; +Cc: gcc-patches

On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 9:22 AM Feng Xue OS <fxue@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> In vectorizable_reduction, one check on a reduction operand via index could be
> contained by another one check via pointer, so remove the former.

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Feng
>
> ---
> gcc/
>         * tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorizable_reduction): Remove the duplicated
>         check.
> ---
>  gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> index d9a2ad69484..6e8b3639daf 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> @@ -7815,11 +7815,9 @@ vectorizable_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
>                              "use not simple.\n");
>           return false;
>         }
> -      if (i == STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info))
> -       continue;
>
> -      /* For an IFN_COND_OP we might hit the reduction definition operand
> -        twice (once as definition, once as else).  */
> +      /* Skip reduction operands, and for an IFN_COND_OP we might hit the
> +        reduction operand twice (once as definition, once as else).  */
>        if (op.ops[i] == op.ops[STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info)])
>         continue;
>
> --
> 2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-19 12:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-16  7:22 [PATCH 2/8] vect: Remove duplicated check on reduction operand Feng Xue OS
2024-06-19 12:35 ` Richard Biener

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).