From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Andre Vieira <Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC] Make stackalign test LTO proof
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2kEj+RbbJ1=0atc6L1vHVNbQwmt5xtLAsgHJ69Tf81-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5649C158.50903@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Andre Vieira
<Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com> wrote:
> On 13/11/15 10:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Andre Vieira
>> <Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch changes this testcase to make sure LTO will not optimize
>>> away
>>> the assignment of the local array to a global variable which was
>>> introduced
>>> to make sure stack space was made available for the test to work.
>>>
>>> This is correct because LTO is supposed to optimize this global away
>>> as at
>>> link time it knows this global will never be read. By adding a read of
>>> the
>>> global, LTO will no longer optimize it away.
>>
>>
>> But that's only because we can't see that bar doesn't clobber it, else
>> we would optimize away the check and get here again. Much better
>> to mark 'dummy' with __attribute__((used)) and go away with 'g' entirely.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Tested by running regressions for this testcase for various ARM
>>> targets.
>>>
>>> Is this OK to commit?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andre Vieira
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>> 2015-11-06 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>
>>>
>>> * gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-1.c: Added read
>>> to global such that a write is not optimized away by LTO.
>>
>>
> Hi Richard,
>
> That would be great but __attribute__ ((used)) can only be used for static
> variables and making dummy static would defeat the purpose here.
I see. What about volatile?
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 15:07 Andre Vieira
2015-11-13 10:34 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-16 11:43 ` Andre Vieira
2015-11-16 13:33 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-11-16 14:08 ` Andre Vieira
2015-11-16 14:31 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-16 15:34 Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
2015-11-16 15:48 ` Andre Vieira
2015-11-17 12:29 ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-11-17 16:30 ` Andre Vieira
2015-12-04 15:19 ` Andre Vieira
2015-12-04 17:34 ` Bernd Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc2kEj+RbbJ1=0atc6L1vHVNbQwmt5xtLAsgHJ69Tf81-Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).