public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libcpp: configure: drop unused Valgrind detection
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:10:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2tgZ6Ad+--1GtQJ8avcLfU9XRQpDkBa+4Cr396_yFR=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123181343.27624-2-amonakov@ispras.ru>

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 7:14 PM Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
>
> When top-level configure has either --enable-checking=valgrind or
> --enable-valgrind-annotations, we want to activate a couple of workarounds
> in libcpp. They do not use anything from the Valgrind API, so just
> delete all detection.

OK

> libcpp/ChangeLog:
>
>         * config.in: Regenerate.
>         * configure: Regenerate.
>         * configure.ac (ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING): Delete.
>         (ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS): Rename to
>         ENABLE_VALGRIND_WORKAROUNDS.  Delete Valgrind header checks.
>         * lex.cc (new_buff): Adjust for renaming.
>         (_cpp_free_buff): Ditto.
> ---
>  libcpp/config.in    | 15 ++--------
>  libcpp/configure    | 70 +--------------------------------------------
>  libcpp/configure.ac | 51 ++-------------------------------
>  libcpp/lex.cc       |  4 +--
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libcpp/config.in b/libcpp/config.in
> index df4fd44c9e..253ef03a3d 100644
> --- a/libcpp/config.in
> +++ b/libcpp/config.in
> @@ -24,12 +24,9 @@
>     language is requested. */
>  #undef ENABLE_NLS
>
> -/* Define to get calls to the valgrind runtime enabled. */
> -#undef ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS
> -
> -/* Define if you want to workaround valgrind (a memory checker) warnings about
> -   possible memory leaks because of libcpp use of interior pointers. */
> -#undef ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING
> +/* Define if you want to workaround Valgrind warnings about possible memory
> +   leaks because of libcpp use of interior pointers. */
> +#undef ENABLE_VALGRIND_WORKAROUNDS
>
>  /* Define to 1 if you have `alloca', as a function or macro. */
>  #undef HAVE_ALLOCA
> @@ -201,9 +198,6 @@
>  /* Define to 1 if you have the <locale.h> header file. */
>  #undef HAVE_LOCALE_H
>
> -/* Define if valgrind's memcheck.h header is installed. */
> -#undef HAVE_MEMCHECK_H
> -
>  /* Define to 1 if you have the <memory.h> header file. */
>  #undef HAVE_MEMORY_H
>
> @@ -252,9 +246,6 @@
>  /* Define to 1 if you have the <unistd.h> header file. */
>  #undef HAVE_UNISTD_H
>
> -/* Define if valgrind's valgrind/memcheck.h header is installed. */
> -#undef HAVE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK_H
> -
>  /* Define as const if the declaration of iconv() needs const. */
>  #undef ICONV_CONST
>
> diff --git a/libcpp/configure b/libcpp/configure
> index 452e4c1f6c..8a38c0546e 100755
> --- a/libcpp/configure
> +++ b/libcpp/configure
> @@ -9116,12 +9116,6 @@ $as_echo "#define ENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING 1" >>confdefs.h
>
>  fi
>
> -if test x$ac_valgrind_checking != x ; then
> -
> -$as_echo "#define ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING 1" >>confdefs.h
> -
> -fi
> -
>  # Check whether --enable-canonical-system-headers was given.
>  if test "${enable_canonical_system_headers+set}" = set; then :
>    enableval=$enable_canonical_system_headers;
> @@ -9405,62 +9399,6 @@ case x$enable_languages in
>  esac
>
>
> -ac_fn_c_check_header_mongrel "$LINENO" "valgrind.h" "ac_cv_header_valgrind_h" "$ac_includes_default"
> -if test "x$ac_cv_header_valgrind_h" = xyes; then :
> -  have_valgrind_h=yes
> -else
> -  have_valgrind_h=no
> -fi
> -
> -
> -
> -# It is certainly possible that there's valgrind but no valgrind.h.
> -# GCC relies on making annotations so we must have both.
> -{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for VALGRIND_DISCARD in <valgrind/memcheck.h>" >&5
> -$as_echo_n "checking for VALGRIND_DISCARD in <valgrind/memcheck.h>... " >&6; }
> -cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
> -/* end confdefs.h.  */
> -#include <valgrind/memcheck.h>
> -#ifndef VALGRIND_DISCARD
> -#error VALGRIND_DISCARD not defined
> -#endif
> -_ACEOF
> -if ac_fn_c_try_cpp "$LINENO"; then :
> -  gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h=yes
> -else
> -  gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h=no
> -fi
> -rm -f conftest.err conftest.i conftest.$ac_ext
> -{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h" >&5
> -$as_echo "$gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h" >&6; }
> -{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for VALGRIND_DISCARD in <memcheck.h>" >&5
> -$as_echo_n "checking for VALGRIND_DISCARD in <memcheck.h>... " >&6; }
> -cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
> -/* end confdefs.h.  */
> -#include <memcheck.h>
> -#ifndef VALGRIND_DISCARD
> -#error VALGRIND_DISCARD not defined
> -#endif
> -_ACEOF
> -if ac_fn_c_try_cpp "$LINENO"; then :
> -  gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h=yes
> -else
> -  gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h=no
> -fi
> -rm -f conftest.err conftest.i conftest.$ac_ext
> -{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h" >&5
> -$as_echo "$gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h" >&6; }
> -if test $gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h = yes; then
> -
> -$as_echo "#define HAVE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK_H 1" >>confdefs.h
> -
> -fi
> -if test $gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h = yes; then
> -
> -$as_echo "#define HAVE_MEMCHECK_H 1" >>confdefs.h
> -
> -fi
> -
>  # Check whether --enable-valgrind-annotations was given.
>  if test "${enable_valgrind_annotations+set}" = set; then :
>    enableval=$enable_valgrind_annotations;
> @@ -9470,14 +9408,8 @@ fi
>
>  if test x$enable_valgrind_annotations != xno \
>      || test x$ac_valgrind_checking != x; then
> -  if (test $have_valgrind_h = no \
> -      && test $gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h = no \
> -      && test $gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h = no); then
> -    as_fn_error $? "*** valgrind annotations requested, but" "$LINENO" 5
> -    as_fn_error $? "*** Can't find valgrind/memcheck.h, memcheck.h or valgrind.h" "$LINENO" 5
> -  fi
>
> -$as_echo "#define ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS 1" >>confdefs.h
> +$as_echo "#define ENABLE_VALGRIND_WORKAROUNDS 1" >>confdefs.h
>
>  fi
>
> diff --git a/libcpp/configure.ac b/libcpp/configure.ac
> index b29b4d6acf..b883fec776 100644
> --- a/libcpp/configure.ac
> +++ b/libcpp/configure.ac
> @@ -185,12 +185,6 @@ if test x$ac_assert_checking != x ; then
>  [Define if you want assertions enabled.  This is a cheap check.])
>  fi
>
> -if test x$ac_valgrind_checking != x ; then
> -  AC_DEFINE(ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING, 1,
> -[Define if you want to workaround valgrind (a memory checker) warnings about
> - possible memory leaks because of libcpp use of interior pointers.])
> -fi
> -
>  AC_ARG_ENABLE(canonical-system-headers,
>  [  --enable-canonical-system-headers
>                            enable or disable system headers canonicalization],
> @@ -241,54 +235,15 @@ case x$enable_languages in
>  esac
>  AC_SUBST(CET_HOST_FLAGS)
>
> -dnl # This check AC_REQUIREs various stuff, so it *must not* be inside
> -dnl # an if statement.  This was the source of very frustrating bugs
> -dnl # in converting to autoconf 2.5x!
> -AC_CHECK_HEADER(valgrind.h, have_valgrind_h=yes, have_valgrind_h=no)
> -
> -# It is certainly possible that there's valgrind but no valgrind.h.
> -# GCC relies on making annotations so we must have both.
> -AC_MSG_CHECKING(for VALGRIND_DISCARD in <valgrind/memcheck.h>)
> -AC_PREPROC_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE(
> -  [[#include <valgrind/memcheck.h>
> -#ifndef VALGRIND_DISCARD
> -#error VALGRIND_DISCARD not defined
> -#endif]])],
> -  [gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h=yes],
> -  [gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h=no])
> -AC_MSG_RESULT($gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h)
> -AC_MSG_CHECKING(for VALGRIND_DISCARD in <memcheck.h>)
> -AC_PREPROC_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE(
> -  [[#include <memcheck.h>
> -#ifndef VALGRIND_DISCARD
> -#error VALGRIND_DISCARD not defined
> -#endif]])],
> -  [gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h=yes],
> -  [gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h=no])
> -AC_MSG_RESULT($gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h)
> -if test $gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h = yes; then
> -  AC_DEFINE(HAVE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK_H, 1,
> -       [Define if valgrind's valgrind/memcheck.h header is installed.])
> -fi
> -if test $gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h = yes; then
> -  AC_DEFINE(HAVE_MEMCHECK_H, 1,
> -       [Define if valgrind's memcheck.h header is installed.])
> -fi
> -
>  AC_ARG_ENABLE(valgrind-annotations,
>  [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-valgrind-annotations],
>                 [enable valgrind runtime interaction])], [],
>  [enable_valgrind_annotations=no])
>  if test x$enable_valgrind_annotations != xno \
>      || test x$ac_valgrind_checking != x; then
> -  if (test $have_valgrind_h = no \
> -      && test $gcc_cv_header_memcheck_h = no \
> -      && test $gcc_cv_header_valgrind_memcheck_h = no); then
> -    AC_MSG_ERROR([*** valgrind annotations requested, but])
> -    AC_MSG_ERROR([*** Can't find valgrind/memcheck.h, memcheck.h or valgrind.h])
> -  fi
> -  AC_DEFINE(ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS, 1,
> -[Define to get calls to the valgrind runtime enabled.])
> +  AC_DEFINE(ENABLE_VALGRIND_WORKAROUNDS, 1,
> +[Define if you want to workaround Valgrind warnings about
> + possible memory leaks because of libcpp use of interior pointers.])
>  fi
>
>  # Output.
> diff --git a/libcpp/lex.cc b/libcpp/lex.cc
> index 0b1b93609e..a5d2f31e76 100644
> --- a/libcpp/lex.cc
> +++ b/libcpp/lex.cc
> @@ -4762,7 +4762,7 @@ new_buff (size_t len)
>      len = MIN_BUFF_SIZE;
>    len = CPP_ALIGN (len);
>
> -#ifdef ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS
> +#ifdef ENABLE_VALGRIND_WORKAROUNDS
>    /* Valgrind warns about uses of interior pointers, so put _cpp_buff
>       struct first.  */
>    size_t slen = CPP_ALIGN2 (sizeof (_cpp_buff), 2 * DEFAULT_ALIGNMENT);
> @@ -4859,7 +4859,7 @@ _cpp_free_buff (_cpp_buff *buff)
>    for (; buff; buff = next)
>      {
>        next = buff->next;
> -#ifdef ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS
> +#ifdef ENABLE_VALGRIND_WORKAROUNDS
>        free (buff);
>  #else
>        free (buff->base);
> --
> 2.39.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-23 18:13 [PATCH 0/2] Clean up Valgrind configury Alexander Monakov
2023-11-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] libcpp: configure: drop unused Valgrind detection Alexander Monakov
2023-11-24  8:10   ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-11-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] gcc: configure: drop Valgrind 3.1 compatibility Alexander Monakov
2023-11-24  8:10   ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFiYyc2tgZ6Ad+--1GtQJ8avcLfU9XRQpDkBa+4Cr396_yFR=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).