From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, stage1] Make parloops gate more strict
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2wKQYNXJorE7JehZjm2W7rUgMQKV2K6JRDuGa1jTDhYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55030211.5060203@mentor.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com> wrote:
> On 13-03-15 13:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:04:57PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not really (I don't like -fdump-passes ...), but we need to make sure
>>>> that -fdump-passes doesn't crash (because it runs very early and
>>>> with cfun == NULL I think)
>>>
>>>
>>> If it runs with cfun == NULL, then supposedly the gates that are
>>> dependent
>>> on current function should for -fdump-passes purposes also return true
>>> if cfun == NULL (well, of course do all the unconditional checks).
>>> Though of course, with optimize/target attributes this is harder, as
>>> different functions can use different options.
>>
>>
>> Yes, one reason why I think -fdump-passes is just broken
>> implementation-wise.
>>
>
> Atm fdump-passes doesn't run with cfun == NULL.
>
> From pass_manager::dump_passes:
> ...
> FOR_EACH_FUNCTION (n)
> if (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (n->decl))
> {
> node = n;
> break;
> }
>
> if (!node)
> return;
>
> push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl));
Um - this now picks a random function which may be one with
an optimize or target attribute associated to it.
Richard.
> ...
>
> This was discussed here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00856.html
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 10:32 Tom de Vries
2015-03-13 10:36 ` Richard Biener
2015-03-13 11:12 ` Tom de Vries
2015-03-13 12:05 ` Richard Biener
2015-03-13 12:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-03-13 12:36 ` Richard Biener
2015-03-13 15:28 ` Tom de Vries
2015-03-18 10:17 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-03-18 11:03 ` Tom de Vries
2015-03-18 11:18 ` Richard Biener
2015-03-18 17:03 ` Tom de Vries
2015-03-19 9:00 ` Richard Biener
2015-03-19 22:40 ` [PATCH] Fix fdump-passes Tom de Vries
2015-03-20 9:18 ` Richard Biener
2015-06-14 10:12 ` [PATCH, stage1] Make parloops gate more strict Tom de Vries
2015-06-14 22:30 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-06-14 22:48 ` Tom de Vries
2015-06-16 11:28 ` Richard Biener
2015-06-19 7:50 ` Tom de Vries
2015-06-29 11:01 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFiYyc2wKQYNXJorE7JehZjm2W7rUgMQKV2K6JRDuGa1jTDhYA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=Tom_deVries@mentor.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).