From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vect: Refactor code for index == count in vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 08:12:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3BC=TFNLm_+oiSwbwx0rGRd-6yFN5tW22znzG0g3vDbw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a012946c-30b8-e3f3-1474-fd5fa0e1ec75@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:19 AM Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Richi,
>
> on 2023/5/17 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 8:09 AM Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch is to refactor the handlings for the case (index
> >> == count) in a loop of vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1, in
> >> order to prepare a subsequent adjustment on *nperm. This
> >> patch doesn't have any functional changes.
> >
> > The diff is impossible to be reviewed - can you explain the
> > refactoring you have done or also attach a patch more clearly
> > showing what you change?
>
> Sorry, I should have made it more clear.
> It mainly to combine these two hunks:
>
> if (index == count && !noop_p)
> {
> // A ...
> // ++*n_perms;
> }
>
> if (index == count)
> {
> if (!analyze_only)
> {
> if (!noop_p)
> // B1 ...
>
> // B2 ...
>
> for ...
> {
> if (!noop_p)
> // B3 building VEC_PERM_EXPR
> else
> // B4 building nothing (no uses for B2 and its seq)
> }
> }
> // B5
> }
>
> The former can be part of the latter, so it becomes to:
>
> if (index == count)
> {
> if (!noop_p)
> {
> // A ...
> // ++*n_perms;
>
> if (!analyze_only)
> {
> // B1 ...
> // B2 ...
> for ...
> // B3 building VEC_PERM_EXPR
> }
> }
> else if (!analyze_only)
> {
> // no B2 since no any further uses here.
> for ...
> // B4 building nothing
> }
> // B5 ...
> }
Ah, thanks - that made reviewing easy. 1/2 is OK for trunk.
Thanks,
Richard.
> But it's mainly the basic for the subsequent patch for consistent n_perms calculation,
> the patch 2/2 is to make it further become to:
>
> if (index == count)
> {
> if (!noop_p)
> {
> // A ...
>
> if (!analyze_only)
> // B1 ...
>
> // B2 ... (trivial computations during analyze_only or not)
>
> for ...
> {
> // ++*n_perms; (now n_perms is consistent with building VEC_PERM_EXPR)
> if (analyze_only)
> continue;
> // B3 building VEC_PERM_EXPR
> }
> }
> else if (!analyze_only)
> {
> // no B2 since no any further uses here.
> for ...
> // B4 building nothing
> }
> // B5 ...
> }
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
>
> >
> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux,
> >> aarch64-linux-gnu and powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu.
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Kewen
> >> -----
> >> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> * tree-vect-slp.cc (vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1): Refactor the
> >> handling on the case index == count.
> >> ---
> >> gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> >> index 3b7a21724ec..e5c9d7e766e 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> >> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> >> @@ -8230,59 +8230,50 @@ vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1 (vec_info *vinfo, slp_tree node,
> >> noop_p = false;
> >> mask[index++] = mask_element;
> >>
> >> - if (index == count && !noop_p)
> >> + if (index == count)
> >> {
> >> - indices.new_vector (mask, second_vec_index == -1 ? 1 : 2, nunits);
> >> - if (!can_vec_perm_const_p (mode, mode, indices))
> >> + if (!noop_p)
> >> {
> >> - if (dump_p)
> >> + indices.new_vector (mask, second_vec_index == -1 ? 1 : 2, nunits);
> >> + if (!can_vec_perm_const_p (mode, mode, indices))
> >> {
> >> - dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION,
> >> - vect_location,
> >> - "unsupported vect permute { ");
> >> - for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
> >> + if (dump_p)
> >> {
> >> - dump_dec (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, mask[i]);
> >> - dump_printf (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, " ");
> >> + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> >> + "unsupported vect permute { ");
> >> + for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
> >> + {
> >> + dump_dec (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, mask[i]);
> >> + dump_printf (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, " ");
> >> + }
> >> + dump_printf (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, "}\n");
> >> }
> >> - dump_printf (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, "}\n");
> >> + gcc_assert (analyze_only);
> >> + return false;
> >> }
> >> - gcc_assert (analyze_only);
> >> - return false;
> >> - }
> >>
> >> - ++*n_perms;
> >> - }
> >> + ++*n_perms;
> >>
> >> - if (index == count)
> >> - {
> >> - if (!analyze_only)
> >> - {
> >> - tree mask_vec = NULL_TREE;
> >> -
> >> - if (! noop_p)
> >> - mask_vec = vect_gen_perm_mask_checked (vectype, indices);
> >> + if (!analyze_only)
> >> + {
> >> + tree mask_vec = vect_gen_perm_mask_checked (vectype, indices);
> >>
> >> - if (second_vec_index == -1)
> >> - second_vec_index = first_vec_index;
> >> + if (second_vec_index == -1)
> >> + second_vec_index = first_vec_index;
> >>
> >> - for (unsigned int ri = 0; ri < nvectors_per_build; ++ri)
> >> - {
> >> - /* Generate the permute statement if necessary. */
> >> - tree first_vec = dr_chain[first_vec_index + ri];
> >> - tree second_vec = dr_chain[second_vec_index + ri];
> >> - gimple *perm_stmt;
> >> - if (! noop_p)
> >> + for (unsigned int ri = 0; ri < nvectors_per_build; ++ri)
> >> {
> >> - gassign *stmt = as_a <gassign *> (stmt_info->stmt);
> >> + /* Generate the permute statement if necessary. */
> >> + tree first_vec = dr_chain[first_vec_index + ri];
> >> + tree second_vec = dr_chain[second_vec_index + ri];
> >> + gassign *stmt = as_a<gassign *> (stmt_info->stmt);
> >> tree perm_dest
> >> = vect_create_destination_var (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt),
> >> vectype);
> >> perm_dest = make_ssa_name (perm_dest);
> >> - perm_stmt
> >> + gimple *perm_stmt
> >> = gimple_build_assign (perm_dest, VEC_PERM_EXPR,
> >> - first_vec, second_vec,
> >> - mask_vec);
> >> + first_vec, second_vec, mask_vec);
> >> vect_finish_stmt_generation (vinfo, stmt_info, perm_stmt,
> >> gsi);
> >> if (dce_chain)
> >> @@ -8290,15 +8281,23 @@ vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1 (vec_info *vinfo, slp_tree node,
> >> bitmap_set_bit (used_defs, first_vec_index + ri);
> >> bitmap_set_bit (used_defs, second_vec_index + ri);
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + /* Store the vector statement in NODE. */
> >> + SLP_TREE_VEC_STMTS (node) [vect_stmts_counter++]
> >> + = perm_stmt;
> >> }
> >> - else
> >> - {
> >> - /* If mask was NULL_TREE generate the requested
> >> - identity transform. */
> >> - perm_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (first_vec);
> >> - if (dce_chain)
> >> - bitmap_set_bit (used_defs, first_vec_index + ri);
> >> - }
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + else if (!analyze_only)
> >> + {
> >> + for (unsigned int ri = 0; ri < nvectors_per_build; ++ri)
> >> + {
> >> + tree first_vec = dr_chain[first_vec_index + ri];
> >> + /* If mask was NULL_TREE generate the requested
> >> + identity transform. */
> >> + gimple *perm_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (first_vec);
> >> + if (dce_chain)
> >> + bitmap_set_bit (used_defs, first_vec_index + ri);
> >>
> >> /* Store the vector statement in NODE. */
> >> SLP_TREE_VEC_STMTS (node)[vect_stmts_counter++] = perm_stmt;
> >> --
> >> 2.39.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-17 6:09 Kewen.Lin
2023-05-17 6:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] vect: Enhance cost evaluation " Kewen.Lin
2023-05-22 13:44 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-23 3:01 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-05-23 6:19 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-24 5:23 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-05-17 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] vect: Refactor code for index == count " Richard Biener
2023-05-17 7:18 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-05-18 6:12 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-05-22 5:37 ` Kewen.Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3BC=TFNLm_+oiSwbwx0rGRd-6yFN5tW22znzG0g3vDbw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).