From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC][07/13]Preserve data references for whole distribution life time
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3BYA7zwkbWYfMbjf5mKB0at68DkAA556SMP=qxCA3mgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHFci2__G2w+ogR3q5W3FsAAoFJYpuyAN94Gd5dodCkkJcQ1Qg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Bin.Cheng <amker.cheng@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Richard Biener
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Bin Cheng <Bin.Cheng@arm.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> This patch collects and preserves all data references in loop for whole
>>> distribution life time. It will be used afterwards.
>>>
>>> Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and AArch64. Is it OK?
>>
>> +/* Vector of data references in the loop to be distributed. */
>> +static vec<data_reference_p> *datarefs_vec;
>> +
>> +/* Map of data reference in the loop to a unique id. */
>> +static hash_map<data_reference_p, int> *datarefs_map;
>> +
>>
>> no need to make those pointers. It's not a unique id but
>> the index into the datarefs_vec vector, right?
>>
>> loop distribution doesn't yet use dr->aux so it would be nice
>> to avoid the hash_map in favor of using that field.
>>
>> #define DR_INDEX (dr) ((uintptr_t)(dr)->aux)
>>
>> + if (datarefs_vec->length () > 64)
>>
>> There is PARAM_VALUE (PARAM_LOOP_MAX_DATAREFS_FOR_DATADEPS)
>> with a default value of 1000. Please use that instead of magic numbers.
>>
>> + {
>> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>> + fprintf (dump_file,
>> + "Loop %d not distributed: more than 64 memory references.\n",
>> + loop->num);
>> +
>> + free_rdg (rdg);
>> + loop_nest->release ();
>> + delete loop_nest;
>> + free_data_refs (*datarefs_vec);
>> + delete datarefs_vec;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>>
>> auto_* were so nice ...
> Hi Richard,
> This is the updated patch. It removes datarefs_map as well as checks
> number of data references against the parameter. Is it OK?
ENOPATCH
> Thanks,
> bin
> 2017-06-07 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com>
>
> * tree-loop-distribution.c (params.h): Include header file.
> (MAX_DATAREFS_NUM, DR_INDEX): New macro.
> (datarefs_vec): New global var.
> (create_rdg_vertices): Use datarefs_vec directly.
> (free_rdg): Don't free data references.
> (build_rdg): Update use. Don't free data references.
> (distribute_loop): Compute global variable for data references.
> Bail out if there are too many data references.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-12 17:03 Bin Cheng
2017-06-13 11:14 ` Richard Biener
2017-06-19 13:34 ` Bin.Cheng
2017-06-19 15:16 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2017-06-19 15:59 ` Bin.Cheng
2017-06-20 11:25 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3BYA7zwkbWYfMbjf5mKB0at68DkAA556SMP=qxCA3mgQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=amker.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).