Re: Some PINGs

[Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 11:21 PM Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> I wonder if reviewers could take a look (or a second look) at some of my
> outstanding patches.
>
> Four nvptx backend patches:
>
> nvptx: Use cvt to perform sign-extension of truncation.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578256.html
>
> nvptx: Add (experimental) support for HFmode with -misa=sm_53
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579623.html
>
> nvptx: Adds uses of -misa=sm_75 and -misa=sm_80
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579691.html
>
> Transition nvptx backend to STORE_FLAG_VALUE = 1
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581004.html
>
> Two middle-end patches:
>
> Simplify paradoxical subreg extensions of TRUNCATE
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/578848.html
>
> PR middle-end/100810: Penalize IV candidates with undefined value bases
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578441.html

I did comment on this one, noting the more general issue.  My opinion is still
that doing heavy lifting in IVOPTs is misplaced.

> And a gfortran patch:
>
> gfortran: Improve translation of POPPAR intrinsic
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548055.html
>
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Roger
> --
>
>