public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: Move EXTRACT_LAST_REDUCTION costing to vectorizable_condition
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3Rh+FdBxZM5icpR8mT0v1Dg-GtWkKd2eS1rNTHkVp-mw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mpttv6xfn6t.fsf@arm.com>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:07 PM Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>
> gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_[57].c started failing after the increase
> in the cost of vec_to_scalar (r278452).  The problem is that we were
> double-counting the cost of the CLASTB: once in vect_model_reduction_cost
> as a vec_to_scalar and once in vectorizable_condition as a plain
> vector_stmt.
>
> Based on the TODO above vect_model_reduction_cost, I think the
> preferred long-term direction is for vectorizable_* to cost these
> things itself, so that's what the patch does (for this one case only).
>
> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu.  OK to install?

OK.

> Richard
>
>
> 2019-11-21  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
>
> gcc/
>         * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_model_simple_cost): Take an optional
>         vect_cost_for_stmt.
>         (vectorizable_condition): Calculate the cost of EXTRACT_LAST_REDUCTION
>         here rather than...
>         * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_model_reduction_cost): ...here.
>
> Index: gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c       2019-11-16 10:29:21.211212189 +0000
> +++ gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c       2019-11-21 12:02:44.058240392 +0000
> @@ -860,7 +860,8 @@ vect_model_simple_cost (stmt_vec_info st
>                         enum vect_def_type *dt,
>                         int ndts,
>                         slp_tree node,
> -                       stmt_vector_for_cost *cost_vec)
> +                       stmt_vector_for_cost *cost_vec,
> +                       vect_cost_for_stmt kind = vector_stmt)
>  {
>    int inside_cost = 0, prologue_cost = 0;
>
> @@ -907,7 +908,7 @@ vect_model_simple_cost (stmt_vec_info st
>      }
>
>    /* Pass the inside-of-loop statements to the target-specific cost model.  */
> -  inside_cost += record_stmt_cost (cost_vec, ncopies, vector_stmt,
> +  inside_cost += record_stmt_cost (cost_vec, ncopies, kind,
>                                    stmt_info, 0, vect_body);
>
>    if (dump_enabled_p ())
> @@ -10081,15 +10082,18 @@ vectorizable_condition (stmt_vec_info st
>                 return false;
>             }
>         }
> -      if (expand_vec_cond_expr_p (vectype, comp_vectype,
> -                                    cond_code))
> -       {
> -         STMT_VINFO_TYPE (stmt_info) = condition_vec_info_type;
> -         vect_model_simple_cost (stmt_info, ncopies, dts, ndts, slp_node,
> -                                 cost_vec);
> -         return true;
> -       }
> -      return false;
> +
> +      vect_cost_for_stmt kind = vector_stmt;
> +      if (reduction_type == EXTRACT_LAST_REDUCTION)
> +       /* Count one reduction-like operation per vector.  */
> +       kind = vec_to_scalar;
> +      else if (!expand_vec_cond_expr_p (vectype, comp_vectype, cond_code))
> +       return false;
> +
> +      STMT_VINFO_TYPE (stmt_info) = condition_vec_info_type;
> +      vect_model_simple_cost (stmt_info, ncopies, dts, ndts, slp_node,
> +                             cost_vec, kind);
> +      return true;
>      }
>
>    /* Transform.  */
> Index: gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/tree-vect-loop.c        2019-11-19 16:25:24.882645490 +0000
> +++ gcc/tree-vect-loop.c        2019-11-21 12:02:44.050240447 +0000
> @@ -3924,8 +3924,11 @@ vect_model_reduction_cost (stmt_vec_info
>
>    code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (orig_stmt_info->stmt);
>
> -  if (reduction_type == EXTRACT_LAST_REDUCTION
> -      || reduction_type == FOLD_LEFT_REDUCTION)
> +  if (reduction_type == EXTRACT_LAST_REDUCTION)
> +    /* No extra instructions are needed in the prologue.  The loop body
> +       operations are costed in vectorizable_condition.  */
> +    inside_cost = 0;
> +  else if (reduction_type == FOLD_LEFT_REDUCTION)
>      {
>        /* No extra instructions needed in the prologue.  */
>        prologue_cost = 0;

      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-21 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-21 12:08 Richard Sandiford
2019-11-21 14:02 ` Richard Biener [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc3Rh+FdBxZM5icpR8mT0v1Dg-GtWkKd2eS1rNTHkVp-mw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).