From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83849 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2018 08:44:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83831 invoked by uid 89); 11 Dec 2018 08:44:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=applying, card, act X-HELO: mail-lj1-f179.google.com Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f179.google.com) (209.85.208.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:44:43 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id e5-v6so12199565lja.4 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:44:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OGOXbo5TWSOuc7ODheZLhjp7BYTXPZ2RZ950BGeb0BI=; b=mOo16RzRiAA0Ck9blGsvQYNF+Lu4oTNYIr0tIzuG4mY1mTeHA8t7FRtleTnCHZ/BhI 3C6LmxX+LQIwb8Mcrpxaz4Rd3sufIr8N0friVb6MV0TWfeZLjmnnflt/SW4sbWuZze7N s2I15Rsp9HfDL2VI4eANuWRTd/Pi8XHBRbAPc9o3dbe/AES8ekpGsSkJv1qivfxoQjhV odotF2a6YdfWb5yulYwLV4W8mNBQJ8EqG6dU9/m8ZYFK+GJQDc6etUegqGdm51rBEjjp vG0+MdcIxqJDvK5K9SaSnhKnx5twNcBhbb7UiTKHR5NDCiXpOvDFzGLpZsJKP6zhabfD c62Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4b748e966e3eeab17f102e1a0112616f2015bf95.1543869218.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <20181203214804.GE12380@tucnak> <0adf63ed-1fca-cfa1-414b-9b022478b6fd@codesourcery.com> <20181210201310.GH3803@gate.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <20181210201310.GH3803@gate.crashing.org> From: Richard Biener Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: andrew@codesourcery.com, Jakub Jelinek , Jeff Law , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:13 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:25:31PM +0000, Andrew Jenner wrote: > > Sorry for the slow response on this, I was on vacation last week. > > > > On 03/12/2018 21:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >I'd give the maintainers the last week to act if they don't want this > > >to happen and if nothing happens, commit it. PR81084 lists all the reasons > > >why it should be removed when it is totally unmaintained. > > >Just make sure to put stuff that belongs there to gcc/ChangeLog and without > > >gcc/ prefixes. > > > > Yes, please go ahead and commit > > Committed to trunk as r266961. > > > - it's not fair on other maintainers to > > have to work around my lack of action on this port. I will continue to > > work on it out-of-tree and hope to restore it once it is in proper shape. > > The more important thing is maintenance... Regular and/or frequent tests > (posted to gcc-testresults@), bug tracker maintenance, etc. You need to > be visible. Very much agreed on that. Though if we pull out this card we're applying double-standards here considering for example ia64 or some embedded ports. Richard. > > Segher