* Fix thinko in gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops
@ 2017-07-25 14:41 Eric Botcazou
2017-07-26 7:52 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2017-07-25 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2929 bytes --]
The attached fix to the Ada front-end introduces a regression in the ACATS
testsuite for cb4009a. The backtrace is:
#0 operation_could_trap_helper_p(tree_code, bool, bool, bool, bool,
tree_node*, bool*) () at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2439
#1 0x00000000012946d7 in stmt_could_throw_1_p (stmt=<optimized out>)
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2759
#2 stmt_could_throw_p(gimple*) [clone .part.186] ()
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2809
#3 0x0000000001295f28 in stmt_could_throw_p (stmt=0x7ffff6c5d420)
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2924
#4 maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt=old_stmt@entry=0x7ffff6c565d8,
new_stmt=new_stmt@entry=0x7ffff6c5d420)
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2908
#5 0x0000000000fd8a0b in gsi_replace(gimple_stmt_iterator*, gimple*, bool) ()
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-iterator.c:447
#6 0x0000000000fd14af in
gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops(gimple_stmt_iterator*, tree_code, tree_node*,
tree_node*, tree_node*) ()
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple.c:1616
#7 0x0000000000fe7af7 in replace_stmt_with_simplification (inplace=false,
seq=0x7fffffffd818, ops=0x7fffffffd820, rcode=..., gsi=0x7fffffffd8e0)
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-fold.c:4151
#8 fold_stmt_1(gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*)) ()
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-fold.c:4462
#9 0x0000000000fe961a in fold_stmt (gsi=gsi@entry=0x7fffffffd8e0,
valueize=valueize@entry=0x1331170 <fwprop_ssa_val(tree)>)
at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-fold.c:4689
The folding is turning a TRUNC_DIV_EXPR into a COND_EXPR and the code does:
/* If the new CODE needs more operands, allocate a new statement. */
if (gimple_num_ops (stmt) < new_rhs_ops + 1)
{
tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
gimple *new_stmt = gimple_alloc (gimple_code (stmt), new_rhs_ops + 1);
memcpy (new_stmt, stmt, gimple_size (gimple_code (stmt)));
gimple_init_singleton (new_stmt);
gsi_replace (gsi, new_stmt, true);
stmt = new_stmt;
/* The LHS needs to be reset as this also changes the SSA name
on the LHS. */
gimple_assign_set_lhs (stmt, lhs);
}
i.e it asks gsi_replace to update EH info, which doesn't work since the new
statement is dummy at this point. Fixed by passing false instead of true.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on mainline as obvious.
2017-07-25 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* gimple.c (gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops): Do not ask gsi_replace
to update EH info here.
2017-07-25 Javier Miranda <miranda@adacore.com>
ada/
* checks.adb (Apply_Divide_Checks): Ensure that operands are not
evaluated twice.
2017-07-25 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
testsuite/
* gnat.dg/opt66.adb: New test.
--
Eric Botcazou
[-- Attachment #2: p.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1334 bytes --]
Index: gimple.c
===================================================================
--- gimple.c (revision 250379)
+++ gimple.c (working copy)
@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops (gimple_stmt_iterat
gimple *new_stmt = gimple_alloc (gimple_code (stmt), new_rhs_ops + 1);
memcpy (new_stmt, stmt, gimple_size (gimple_code (stmt)));
gimple_init_singleton (new_stmt);
- gsi_replace (gsi, new_stmt, true);
+ gsi_replace (gsi, new_stmt, false);
stmt = new_stmt;
/* The LHS needs to be reset as this also changes the SSA name
Index: ada/checks.adb
===================================================================
--- ada/checks.adb (revision 250379)
+++ ada/checks.adb (working copy)
@@ -1818,6 +1818,13 @@ package body Checks is
and then
((not LOK) or else (Llo = LLB))
then
+ -- Ensure that expressions are not evaluated twice (once
+ -- for their runtime checks and once for their regular
+ -- computation).
+
+ Force_Evaluation (Left, Mode => Strict);
+ Force_Evaluation (Right, Mode => Strict);
+
Insert_Action (N,
Make_Raise_Constraint_Error (Loc,
Condition =>
[-- Attachment #3: opt66.adb --]
[-- Type: text/x-adasrc, Size: 205 bytes --]
-- { dg-do compile }
-- { dg-options "-O" }
procedure Opt66 (I : Integer) is
E : exception;
begin
if I = 0 then
raise E;
end if;
Opt66 (I - I / abs (I));
exception
when others => null;
end;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix thinko in gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops
2017-07-25 14:41 Fix thinko in gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops Eric Botcazou
@ 2017-07-26 7:52 ` Richard Biener
2017-07-28 7:37 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2017-07-26 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: GCC Patches
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
> The attached fix to the Ada front-end introduces a regression in the ACATS
> testsuite for cb4009a. The backtrace is:
>
> #0 operation_could_trap_helper_p(tree_code, bool, bool, bool, bool,
> tree_node*, bool*) () at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2439
> #1 0x00000000012946d7 in stmt_could_throw_1_p (stmt=<optimized out>)
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2759
> #2 stmt_could_throw_p(gimple*) [clone .part.186] ()
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2809
> #3 0x0000000001295f28 in stmt_could_throw_p (stmt=0x7ffff6c5d420)
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2924
> #4 maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt=old_stmt@entry=0x7ffff6c565d8,
> new_stmt=new_stmt@entry=0x7ffff6c5d420)
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2908
> #5 0x0000000000fd8a0b in gsi_replace(gimple_stmt_iterator*, gimple*, bool) ()
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-iterator.c:447
> #6 0x0000000000fd14af in
> gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops(gimple_stmt_iterator*, tree_code, tree_node*,
> tree_node*, tree_node*) ()
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple.c:1616
> #7 0x0000000000fe7af7 in replace_stmt_with_simplification (inplace=false,
> seq=0x7fffffffd818, ops=0x7fffffffd820, rcode=..., gsi=0x7fffffffd8e0)
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-fold.c:4151
> #8 fold_stmt_1(gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*)) ()
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-fold.c:4462
> #9 0x0000000000fe961a in fold_stmt (gsi=gsi@entry=0x7fffffffd8e0,
> valueize=valueize@entry=0x1331170 <fwprop_ssa_val(tree)>)
> at /home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/gimple-fold.c:4689
>
> The folding is turning a TRUNC_DIV_EXPR into a COND_EXPR and the code does:
>
> /* If the new CODE needs more operands, allocate a new statement. */
> if (gimple_num_ops (stmt) < new_rhs_ops + 1)
> {
> tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
> gimple *new_stmt = gimple_alloc (gimple_code (stmt), new_rhs_ops + 1);
> memcpy (new_stmt, stmt, gimple_size (gimple_code (stmt)));
> gimple_init_singleton (new_stmt);
> gsi_replace (gsi, new_stmt, true);
> stmt = new_stmt;
>
> /* The LHS needs to be reset as this also changes the SSA name
> on the LHS. */
> gimple_assign_set_lhs (stmt, lhs);
> }
>
> i.e it asks gsi_replace to update EH info, which doesn't work since the new
> statement is dummy at this point. Fixed by passing false instead of true.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on mainline as obvious.
I think we should get rid of that update-EH-info flag, always assuming
false. This
is IMHO a too low-level interface to do this (and we lack a
gsi_replace_without_update)
Not sure if you're willing to do this kind of cleanup ;)
Richard.
>
> 2017-07-25 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
>
> * gimple.c (gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops): Do not ask gsi_replace
> to update EH info here.
>
>
> 2017-07-25 Javier Miranda <miranda@adacore.com>
>
> ada/
> * checks.adb (Apply_Divide_Checks): Ensure that operands are not
> evaluated twice.
>
>
> 2017-07-25 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
>
> testsuite/
> * gnat.dg/opt66.adb: New test.
>
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix thinko in gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops
2017-07-26 7:52 ` Richard Biener
@ 2017-07-28 7:37 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2017-07-28 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Biener; +Cc: gcc-patches
> I think we should get rid of that update-EH-info flag, always assuming
> false. This is IMHO a too low-level interface to do this (and we lack a
> gsi_replace_without_update)
This looks doable (there is only one call to gsi_replace that tests the return
value) but the current interface is probably the most convenient.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-28 7:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-25 14:41 Fix thinko in gimple_assign_set_rhs_with_ops Eric Botcazou
2017-07-26 7:52 ` Richard Biener
2017-07-28 7:37 ` Eric Botcazou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).