From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Improve loop dumping
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 10:35:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3hf=CuUSkf9zTBv7Sm5Yr=PZN64BJZxyPzfNwMsZKH9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZLo5+wTc5gkQIIP/@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 9:57 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> we have flow_loop_dump and print_loop. While print_loop was extended to dump
> stuff from loop structure we added over years (loop info), flow_loop_dump was not.
> -fdump-tree-all files contains flow_loop_dump which makes it hard to see what
> metadata we have attached to loop.
>
> This patch unifies dumping of these fields from both functions. For example for:
> int a[100];
> main()
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> a[i]=i;
> }
> we now print:
> ;; Loop 0
> ;; header 0, latch 1
> ;; depth 0, outer -1
> ;; nodes: 0 1 2 3 4 5
> ;;
> ;; Loop 1
> ;; header 4, latch 3
> ;; depth 1, outer 0, finite_p
> ;; upper_bound 10
> ;; likely_upper_bound 10
> ;; estimate 10
> ;; iterations by profile: 10.001101 (unreliable)
>
> finite_p, upper_bound, likely_upper_bound estimate and iterations by profile is new.
>
> Bootstrap/regtest on x86_64 in progress. OK if it passes?
OK.
> Honza
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * cfgloop.cc (flow_loop_dump): Use print_loop_info.
> * cfgloop.h (print_loop_info): Declare.
> * tree-cfg.cc (print_loop_info): Break out from ...; add
> printing of missing fields and profile
> (print_loop): ... here.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cfgloop.cc b/gcc/cfgloop.cc
> index 020e5734d95..9ca85e648a7 100644
> --- a/gcc/cfgloop.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cfgloop.cc
> @@ -135,17 +135,12 @@ flow_loop_dump (const class loop *loop, FILE *file,
> fprintf (file, "\n");
> }
>
> - fprintf (file, ";; depth %d, outer %ld\n",
> + fprintf (file, ";; depth %d, outer %ld",
> loop_depth (loop), (long) (loop_outer (loop)
> ? loop_outer (loop)->num : -1));
> + print_loop_info (file, loop, ";; ");
>
> - bool reliable;
> - sreal iterations;
> - if (loop->num && expected_loop_iterations_by_profile (loop, &iterations, &reliable))
> - fprintf (file, ";; profile-based iteration count: %f %s\n",
> - iterations.to_double (), reliable ? "(reliable)" : "(unreliable)");
> -
> - fprintf (file, ";; nodes:");
> + fprintf (file, "\n;; nodes:");
> bbs = get_loop_body (loop);
> for (i = 0; i < loop->num_nodes; i++)
> fprintf (file, " %d", bbs[i]->index);
> diff --git a/gcc/cfgloop.h b/gcc/cfgloop.h
> index 4d2fd4b6af5..269694c7962 100644
> --- a/gcc/cfgloop.h
> +++ b/gcc/cfgloop.h
> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ extern unsigned expected_loop_iterations (class loop *);
> extern rtx doloop_condition_get (rtx_insn *);
>
> void mark_loop_for_removal (loop_p);
> +void print_loop_info (FILE *file, const class loop *loop, const char *);
>
> /* Induction variable analysis. */
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
> index 7ccc2a5a5a7..a6c97a04662 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
> @@ -8479,6 +8479,55 @@ print_loops_bb (FILE *file, basic_block bb, int indent, int verbosity)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Print loop information. */
> +
> +void
> +print_loop_info (FILE *file, const class loop *loop, const char *prefix)
> +{
> + if (loop->can_be_parallel)
> + fprintf (file, ", can_be_parallel");
> + if (loop->warned_aggressive_loop_optimizations)
> + fprintf (file, ", warned_aggressive_loop_optimizations");
> + if (loop->dont_vectorize)
> + fprintf (file, ", dont_vectorize");
> + if (loop->force_vectorize)
> + fprintf (file, ", force_vectorize");
> + if (loop->in_oacc_kernels_region)
> + fprintf (file, ", in_oacc_kernels_region");
> + if (loop->finite_p)
> + fprintf (file, ", finite_p");
> + if (loop->unroll)
> + fprintf (file, "\n%sunroll %d", prefix, loop->unroll);
> + if (loop->nb_iterations)
> + {
> + fprintf (file, "\n%sniter ", prefix);
> + print_generic_expr (file, loop->nb_iterations);
> + }
> +
> + if (loop->any_upper_bound)
> + {
> + fprintf (file, "\n%supper_bound ", prefix);
> + print_decu (loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound, file);
> + }
> + if (loop->any_likely_upper_bound)
> + {
> + fprintf (file, "\n%slikely_upper_bound ", prefix);
> + print_decu (loop->nb_iterations_likely_upper_bound, file);
> + }
> +
> + if (loop->any_estimate)
> + {
> + fprintf (file, "\n%sestimate ", prefix);
> + print_decu (loop->nb_iterations_estimate, file);
> + }
> + bool reliable;
> + sreal iterations;
> + if (loop->num && expected_loop_iterations_by_profile (loop, &iterations, &reliable))
> + fprintf (file, "\n%siterations by profile: %f %s", prefix,
> + iterations.to_double (), reliable ? "(reliable)" : "(unreliable)");
> +
> +}
> +
> static void print_loop_and_siblings (FILE *, class loop *, int, int);
>
> /* Pretty print LOOP on FILE, indented INDENT spaces. Following
> @@ -8511,27 +8560,7 @@ print_loop (FILE *file, class loop *loop, int indent, int verbosity)
> fprintf (file, ", latch = %d", loop->latch->index);
> else
> fprintf (file, ", multiple latches");
> - fprintf (file, ", niter = ");
> - print_generic_expr (file, loop->nb_iterations);
> -
> - if (loop->any_upper_bound)
> - {
> - fprintf (file, ", upper_bound = ");
> - print_decu (loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound, file);
> - }
> - if (loop->any_likely_upper_bound)
> - {
> - fprintf (file, ", likely_upper_bound = ");
> - print_decu (loop->nb_iterations_likely_upper_bound, file);
> - }
> -
> - if (loop->any_estimate)
> - {
> - fprintf (file, ", estimate = ");
> - print_decu (loop->nb_iterations_estimate, file);
> - }
> - if (loop->unroll)
> - fprintf (file, ", unroll = %d", loop->unroll);
> + print_loop_info (file, loop, s_indent);
> fprintf (file, ")\n");
>
> /* Print loop's body. */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 7:55 Jan Hubicka
2023-07-21 8:35 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3hf=CuUSkf9zTBv7Sm5Yr=PZN64BJZxyPzfNwMsZKH9g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).