From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Robin Dapp <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] internal-fn: Do not force vcond operand to reg.
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 15:21:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3iX50j87=u9TBr7jVf6mi+hZ0P4vQZP61C_exG8nQFoA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ee89471-d998-4734-a7d3-1f947d0d9f22@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 3:18 PM Robin Dapp <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this only forces the first comparison operator into a register if it is
> not already suitable.
>
> Bootstrap and regtest is running on x86 and aarch64, successful on p10.
> Regtested on riscv.
How does this make a difference in the end? I'd expect say forwprop to
fix things?
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR middle-end/113474
>
> * internal-fn.cc (expand_vec_cond_mask_optab_fn): Only force
> op1 to reg if necessary.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr113474.c: New test.
>
> Regards
> Robin
>
> ---
> gcc/internal-fn.cc | 3 ++-
> .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr113474.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr113474.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.cc b/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> index 2c764441cde..72cc6b7a1f7 100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> @@ -3164,7 +3164,8 @@ expand_vec_cond_mask_optab_fn (internal_fn, gcall *stmt, convert_optab optab)
> rtx_op2 = expand_normal (op2);
>
> mask = force_reg (mask_mode, mask);
> - rtx_op1 = force_reg (mode, rtx_op1);
> + if (!insn_operand_matches (icode, 1, rtx_op1))
> + rtx_op1 = force_reg (mode, rtx_op1);
>
> rtx target = expand_expr (lhs, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
> create_output_operand (&ops[0], target, mode);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr113474.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr113474.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..0364bf9f5e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr113474.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target riscv_v } } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99" } */
> +
> +void
> +foo (int n, int **a)
> +{
> + int b;
> + for (b = 0; b < n; b++)
> + for (long e = 8; e > 0; e--)
> + a[b][e] = a[b][e] == 15;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "vmerge.vim" } } */
> --
> 2.45.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-10 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 13:17 Robin Dapp
2024-05-10 13:21 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2024-05-13 6:18 ` Robin Dapp
2024-05-13 7:53 ` Richard Biener
2024-05-13 14:14 ` Robin Dapp
2024-05-13 14:19 ` Richard Biener
2024-05-17 10:35 ` Robin Dapp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3iX50j87=u9TBr7jVf6mi+hZ0P4vQZP61C_exG8nQFoA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).