From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] debug-early merge: compiler proper
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3o5XxEmnzrboCrXdMAStAiySsVUcnKJqsG_NzesJ7riA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556C998D.2050209@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 01:00 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On June 1, 2015 5:42:57 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/01/2015 04:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Richard Biener
>
>
>>> We still have the problem that function locals in dwarf2out are seen in
>>>
>>> decls_for_scope by iterating through BLOCK_VARS, and temporaries do not
>>>
>>> live in BLOCK_VARS.
>>>
>>> How did they get picked up and annotated in your approach?
>>
>>
>> The size type ones are in BLOCJ_VARS IIRC (or I have to check the last
>> posted patch for other related hunks).
>
>
> Hmmm, it doesn't seem so in my testcase:
>
> $ cat a.c
> unsigned int i=555;
>
> int main()
> {
> unsigned int array[i];
> __asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : "m" (array));
> }
>
> (gdb) print stmt
> $108 = <block 0x7ffff02b0420>
> (gdb) call debug_generic_stmt(stmt)
> BLOCK #0
> SUPERCONTEXT: main
> VARS: array
>
> The temporary has DECL_IGNORED_P appropriately.
>
> It does show up in DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION()->local_decls, but so do a few
> other temporaries and SSA variables which we're not interested in.
Ok, so I have the following in my LTO debug patch (ignore the first part of the
2nd hunk - just look at the variably_modified_type_p case), which means you
are correct. The ??? comment in process_vla_type needs fixing of course,
either there or in walk_type_fields (to catch all cases that have gimplified
sizes, see callers of gimplify_one_sizepos/gimplify_type_sizes).
I suppose we can change things this way as a followup (as it needs some work)
@@ -21036,6 +21263,31 @@ gen_block_die (tree stmt, dw_die_ref context_die)
decls_for_scope (stmt, context_die);
}
+static tree
+process_vla_type (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *ctx)
+{
+ /* ??? walk_type_fields doesn't walk TYPE_SIZE and friends and
+ while it walks TYPE_DOMAIN for arrays it doesn't walk
+ TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUE. Just special-case the ARRAY_TYPE domain
+ type case here for now. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (*tp) == INTEGER_TYPE)
+ {
+ if (TREE_CODE (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (*tp)) == VAR_DECL
+ && DECL_ARTIFICIAL (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (*tp))
+ && !DECL_IGNORED_P (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (*tp)))
+ gen_decl_die (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (*tp), NULL_TREE, (dw_die_ref) ctx);
+ if (TREE_CODE (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (*tp)) == VAR_DECL
+ && DECL_ARTIFICIAL (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (*tp))
+ && !DECL_IGNORED_P (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (*tp)))
+ gen_decl_die (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (*tp), NULL_TREE, (dw_die_ref) ctx);
+ }
+
+ if (!TYPE_P (*tp))
+ *walk_subtrees = 0;
+
+ return NULL_TREE;
+}
+
/* Process variable DECL (or variable with origin ORIGIN) within
block STMT and add it to CONTEXT_DIE. */
static void
@@ -21061,7 +21313,44 @@ process_scope_var (tree stmt, tree decl, tree
origin, dw_die_ref context_die)
stmt, context_die);
}
else
- gen_decl_die (decl, origin, context_die);
+ {
+ if (decl && DECL_P (decl))
+ die = lookup_decl_die (decl);
+
+ if (in_lto_p
+ && die && die->die_parent != context_die)
+ {
+ /* ??? For non-LTO operation we do not want to get here via
+ dwarf2out_abstract_function / set_decl_origin_self which
+ ends up modifying the tree rep in some odd way instead
+ of just playing with the DIEs. */
+ /* We associate vars with their DECL_CONTEXT first which misses
+ their BLOCK association. Move them. */
+ gcc_assert (die->die_parent != NULL);
+ /* ??? Moving is expensive. Better fix DECL_CONTEXT? */
+ dw_die_ref prev = die->die_parent->die_child;
+ while (prev->die_sib != die)
+ prev = prev->die_sib;
+ remove_child_with_prev (die, prev);
+ add_child_die (context_die, die);
+ }
+
+ if (in_lto_p
+ && TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL
+ && variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (decl), cfun->decl))
+ {
+ /* We need to add location attributes to decls refered to
+ from the decls type but we don't have DIEs for the type
+ itself materialized. The decls are also not part of the
+ functions BLOCK tree (because they are artificial). */
+ walk_tree (&TREE_TYPE (decl), process_vla_type, NULL, NULL);
+ }
+
+ /* ??? The following gets stray type DIEs created even for decls
+ that were created early. */
+
+ gen_decl_die (decl, origin, context_die);
+ }
}
/* Generate all of the decls declared within a given scope and (recursively)
> Aldy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 0:41 Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-18 11:06 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-18 14:47 ` Jan Hubicka
[not found] ` <555CAD35.5040304@redhat.com>
2015-05-20 21:03 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-20 21:11 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-20 22:11 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-22 9:00 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-05-22 11:45 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-22 13:41 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-22 11:26 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-22 14:29 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-27 13:18 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-27 12:50 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-28 20:12 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-28 20:54 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-28 21:01 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-28 21:10 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-28 21:16 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-29 12:07 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-29 19:33 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-29 19:40 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-29 19:49 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-31 7:53 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-31 22:14 ` Jason Merrill
2015-06-01 8:03 ` Richard Biener
2015-06-01 8:04 ` Richard Biener
2015-06-01 15:43 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-06-01 17:01 ` Richard Biener
2015-06-01 17:42 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-06-02 8:13 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-06-02 19:25 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-29 19:47 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-28 21:31 ` Aldy Hernandez
2015-05-29 6:33 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFiYyc3o5XxEmnzrboCrXdMAStAiySsVUcnKJqsG_NzesJ7riA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).