From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81664 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2016 11:11:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81634 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2016 11:11:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wm0-f41.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:11:31 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id q128so29976348wma.1; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:11:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=egBg8eVvUrbLs7INPnrr7a+U1Qa0BRl15pXSlXISNt0=; b=ZGBICZNzTErjZu4veNdKVFJndSyrdGYi4QO/FpapwiUNoW2cLoiV2lKRpnxK5B5uuJ Ez9J2QXxkEzxc6uovtnFqWa6G7gXrExXsYUlJ2gJXNb6gjK4CpcGEvQbjHILlMXmb11S ODdkXpM+/YQujTu1DISVYkZOWy8pnSWgYkFK11GbwXs77Wx15eF20l01BbpLu394SEXu c3urNDZSJr62P7lZHCAWseFrH6B1B++miioP1lYfPZFIo4Y7j4t3PF2dkTw1TDMMJHSx joRdyZ32lDp5fMD2uvvOyW8Io/XafgvkVZV/SqXKBzjbiiRvaq9btVLHMKo3AM+WXEnH VJYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutLn53WKL+Q/7mR5Lsq623Yav+lncZc2DA+DWaXc55OrSWGKzfyoBhYwZki8bb0qvUis/tEiIJQCiMZ/Q== X-Received: by 10.28.139.144 with SMTP id n138mr3359121wmd.71.1471605089095; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:11:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.137.202 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:11:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160817154244.GA39270@arm.com> From: Richard Biener Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Implement C _FloatN, _FloatNx types [version 6] To: Joseph Myers Cc: James Greenhalgh , GCC Patches , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , Jason Merrill , Richard Earnshaw , Nick Clifton , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Marcus Shawcroft , David Edelsohn , Segher Boessenkool , Michael Meissner , murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nd@arm.com, Per Bothner , David Malcolm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg01401.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Ok if libcpp maintainers do not object. > > I consider the libcpp changes something I can self-approve - but, any > comments? No comments on that part. >> Can you quickly verify if LTO works with the new types? I don't see anything >> that would prevent it but having new global trees and backends initializing them >> might come up with surprises (see tree-streamer.c:preload_common_nodes) > > Well, the execution tests are in gcc.dg/torture, which is run with various > options including -flto (and I've checked the testsuite logs to confirm > these tests are indeed run with such options). Is there something else > you think should be tested? No, I think that's enough. Thanks, Richard. > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > joseph@codesourcery.com