public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3sh+YtCRNVnrdu2Ec-sc5cjZcR7BF20xUxJLWQQF1S=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F7AD4CA.8010000@arm.com>

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/12 10:29, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 04/02/2012 10:06 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>>> On 29/03/12 20:34, dann frazier wrote:
>>>>> This is an updated version of a patch Debian and Ubuntu are using to
>>>>> use an alternate linker path for hardfloat binaries. The difference
>>>>> with this one is that it covers the case where no float flag
>>>>> was passed in, defaulting to the softfloat path.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012-03-29  dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>    * config/arm/linux-elf.h: Use alternate linker path
>>>>>           for hardfloat ABI
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h     (revision 185708)
>>>>> +++ gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h     (working copy)
>>>>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@
>>>>>
>>>>>  #define LIBGCC_SPEC "%{mfloat-abi=soft*:-lfloat} -lgcc"
>>>>>
>>>>> -#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER "/lib/ld-linux.so.2"
>>>>> +#define LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SF "/lib/ld-linux.so.3"
>>>>> +#define LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HF "/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3"
>>>>>
>>>>>  #define LINUX_TARGET_LINK_SPEC  "%{h*} \
>>>>>     %{static:-Bstatic} \
>>>>>     %{shared:-shared} \
>>>>>     %{symbolic:-Bsymbolic} \
>>>>>     %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} \
>>>>> -   -dynamic-linker " GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER " \
>>>>> +   %{msoft-float:-dynamic-linker " LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SF "} \
>>>>> +   %{mfloat-abi=soft*:-dynamic-linker " LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SF "} \
>>>>> +   %{mhard-float:-dynamic-linker " LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HF "} \
>>>>> +   %{mfloat-abi=hard:-dynamic-linker " LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HF "} \
>>>>> +   %{!mfloat-abi: \
>>>>> +     %{!msoft-float: \
>>>>> +       %{!mhard-float:-dynamic-linker " LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SF "}}} \
>>>>>     -X \
>>>>>     %{mbig-endian:-EB} %{mlittle-endian:-EL}" \
>>>>>     SUBTARGET_EXTRA_LINK_SPEC
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks to me as though this will break the old Linux ABI.  While we've
>>>> marked that as deprecated, it hasn't been removed as yet.  So I think
>>>> this patch either needs to wait until that removal has taken place, or
>>>> provide the relevant updates to maintain the old ABI support.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review. You're right, this does appear to break the
>>> old ABI - that was a misunderstanding on my part. I think this fixes
>>> the problem:
>>
>> But what about those of us who are using hard-float but not the
>> Debian liker path?  It'll break, surely.  This looks to be like
>> it's Debian-specific.
>>
>
> Are you trying to tell me that some distros are using /lib/ld-linux.so.3
> directly for hard-float?  Sigh, you distro guys need to start talking to
> each other, rather than just going of inventing things ...
>
> If, so then there's only one way to sort out this mess.
>
> /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/ld-linux.so.3  Location of soft-float loader
> /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 Location of hard-float loader
> /lib/ld-linux.so.3 legacy symlink to one of the above.
>
> Or something of this nature.
>
> All this is outside of GCC's remit though and I'm not in a position to
> drive any of it through.
>
> :-( :-( :-(

Now, I wonder why the dynamic linker cannot figure out the ABI itself
by means of using ELF flags or so?

Richard.

> R.
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-03 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-29 19:34 dann frazier
2012-03-30 17:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-02 21:07   ` dann frazier
2012-04-03  3:29     ` Michael Hope
2012-04-03 14:31       ` dann frazier
2012-04-03 22:56       ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-04  2:40         ` Michael Hope
2012-04-04  9:06           ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-04 12:10             ` Dennis Gilmore
2012-04-05 13:30               ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-05 14:13                 ` Niels de Vos
2012-04-05 15:09                 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 15:24                   ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-05 15:55                     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 16:25                       ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-10  4:10                         ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 16:16                   ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05 17:36                     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-04 23:33             ` Michael Hope
2012-04-05  0:07               ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-05  1:17                 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-05 16:05                   ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05 16:03               ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05  1:32           ` dann frazier
2012-04-05 14:57         ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-10 20:31         ` Carlos O'Donell
2012-04-03  9:29     ` Andrew Haley
2012-04-03 10:46       ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-03 10:51         ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2012-04-03 10:55           ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-04  8:59             ` Andrew Haley
2012-04-03 11:02         ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-03 16:10           ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-03 16:18             ` Andrew Haley
2012-04-03 21:19               ` Michael Hope
2012-04-03 23:12                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-03 23:49                   ` Michael Hope
2012-04-04  0:00                     ` Peter Robinson
2012-04-04  0:56                     ` Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2012-04-04  1:35                       ` Michael Hope
2012-04-04  6:54                         ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-04  9:16                           ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-04 22:51                           ` Michael Hope
2012-04-09 20:48                             ` Adam Conrad
2012-04-09 23:14                               ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-09 23:31                                 ` Adam Conrad
2012-04-10  4:01                                   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-10  5:17                                     ` Adam Conrad
2012-04-10  5:36                                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-10  9:19                                         ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-10 14:35                                           ` Dennis Gilmore
2012-04-10 15:14                                             ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-10 15:39                                             ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-11 12:06                                               ` Jeff Law
2012-04-10  6:17                                       ` Jeff Law
2012-04-10 16:47                                         ` Michael Edwards
2012-04-11  3:15                                           ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-11 17:22                                             ` Michael K. Edwards
2012-04-11  3:08                                       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-10  4:17                                 ` Jeff Law
2012-04-10  4:43                                   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-10  5:26                               ` Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2012-04-05 13:34                           ` Dennis Gilmore
2012-04-11 10:55                             ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-05 14:39                         ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05 15:09                           ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 15:38                             ` Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2012-04-05 14:33                   ` Steve McIntyre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3sh+YtCRNVnrdu2Ec-sc5cjZcR7BF20xUxJLWQQF1S=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).