public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/88136, -Wdeprecated-copy too noisy
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 18:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFk2RUY2QCETnjnCpoE8es0abY0ADVBQfdqj+a2gvGhdZoR+Cw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFk2RUaH+xwVu9qL3qrP1d3ERhgBVb+pYjBbQ6BqtwNjM0+9cA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 20:05, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen@gmail.com> wrote:

> > New compiler releases will usually include new warnings that require
> > some code modification to accommodate.  Why is this one particularly
> > problematic?
>
> I don't think it's any more problematic than any other warning that
> introduces new errors for fools that build with -Wall and -Werror.
> But considering that those errors are false positives, and that
> turning them off will in some cases require writing boiler-plate
> (defaulted assignments), I would merely prefer having another release
> round to get fixes for my codebase out in the wild.

For what it's worth, I find it unfortunate that this deprecation and
its resulting warnings end up
making the decision on whether a "rule of 5" must be followed; correct
code needs to be adjusted
to cope with a fairly stylistic matter, with false positives and all.

I'll vote with my feet:

diff --git a/mkspecs/features/qt_common.prf b/mkspecs/features/qt_common.prf
index 4ad9946..3ba7eff 100644
--- a/mkspecs/features/qt_common.prf
+++ b/mkspecs/features/qt_common.prf
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ clang {
     greaterThan(QT_GCC_MAJOR_VERSION, 5): QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_ON +=
-Wshift-overflow=2 -Wduplicated-cond
     # GCC 7 has a lot of false positives relating to this, so disable
completely
     greaterThan(QT_GCC_MAJOR_VERSION, 6): QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_ON +=
-Wno-stringop-overflow
+    # GCC 9 has a lot of false positives relating to this, so disable
completely
+    greaterThan(QT_GCC_MAJOR_VERSION, 8): QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_ON +=
-Wno-deprecated-copy
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-08 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06 21:12 Jason Merrill
2018-12-08 16:46 ` Ville Voutilainen
2018-12-08 16:58   ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-12-08 17:17     ` Ville Voutilainen
2018-12-08 17:53       ` Jason Merrill
2018-12-08 18:05         ` Ville Voutilainen
2018-12-08 18:33           ` Ville Voutilainen [this message]
2018-12-12 14:52             ` Jason Merrill
2018-12-12 15:30               ` Ville Voutilainen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFk2RUY2QCETnjnCpoE8es0abY0ADVBQfdqj+a2gvGhdZoR+Cw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).