From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D7A03858C20; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:46:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8D7A03858C20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id ew6so21498037edb.7; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 03:46:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679568398; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+Cav5KolT9GSSr3PG4Wh8jP4UzpaNpIL0SCL1RAUkto=; b=mys5wi68V2tbrpgqrIhbL/fmRqxs0fVyiQmgKmgHLwTLLzkkeIg4e44VPMRO1qFWxo zQCXaDPtZgInV4nfT4cq8cDVLg410l9pDKxxhNfmwj5s6O9FjiMbNMwjvkgrzXaqpPVX wHMAsyY0Ikt0jtXSiHUlJoQOFoWjpaSoBTVdz1yGjneTaKAI1hO7T8ouDBlxSc4PC+n1 i2ZjtdNNWNLwqgZB5zpEcQIBId3Ij4suijVEOhqxrnVutP4G4HJuzEUHHR8G4s5yNlAe 1rqPG9chuoSYcU7lCpO60MSj+Ch5nG985Cu3AAnIvBobEd421iK/SV4CuuyJasdgTfSG cBew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679568398; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+Cav5KolT9GSSr3PG4Wh8jP4UzpaNpIL0SCL1RAUkto=; b=vgWvzfMtl8mHPAg76oRMRcbh7nIllzJBDmSIt6j60tLfpRVytRvas9wHyqISfAv77X e4jqY3hnArcZZWNHNbmfCJtTf0Bj0NHJ7tB24HeXQRvm+ozKFjtc51O1Mt12J6hSDNvo ldpoplAi4ghGQrhDiFOGO6fZK3AFMUWg8XPvMaJYY21d6umjvcWakmm/1Xe/1+vXPMSk Ph0kPJb6csyU1dr1TXU6GmVIJiHLbCAWL0W1e7/rz/V0M1LRH94uzFHP9jcbYqez1cl8 5Lv761AkKP8c51vXQTxyRlRUJrKKW66JxNcp+S9db7VYb7XVkGwZyBJINYhcme4KuZoX cnmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWNsCLzYk+DlIVNaBPvmPuKJbgHag553pyquT+upZ/GRc/jqRKH ewUefjNntXGfzjLe2ZC8fMnQULYMEMaJLPzx2HA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+cFvM2qhiKTwPDlEVLfFZtUdMZW/PL+sGPppNCWzlBR9/+JdZErJcUwdV7envXB98k7VZsesgErhSrWIshsMA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:95a:b0:931:c1a:b526 with SMTP id j26-20020a170906095a00b009310c1ab526mr4678704ejd.5.1679568397966; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 03:46:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230323020458.54515-1-kmatsui@cs.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Ville Voutilainen Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:46:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: use __bool_constant instead of integral_constant To: Ken Matsui Cc: Jonathan Wakely , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 12:18, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++ wrote: > > Thank you so much for your review! > > This is my first time contributing to GCC, so I do not have a GCC > copyright assignment. I googled those two ways, but I am still > confused... Is it correct that the DCO sign-off has been getting more > common recently? If so, I will put the sign-off into all my patches. I > would prefer to choose the more common and lightweight way. DCO sign-off is indeed more light-weight, and sure, it's becoming more common since it's relatively new as an option.