From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF3A3858C20; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:56:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6BF3A3858C20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id o12so84570907edb.9; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 03:56:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679569014; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B53t85PFu51dfvSDbZbCGX7SdLvRCaAa1P1shQzSHI8=; b=mM+eqliM8RlCeV3Irwm8dp6wKcl0FXJ0auudRpJlIcJLJFfCOnGLr+W5y43R+rxonr SjQ5W7MwmFFYkztctVQznSRshj1YQXrKXH48CXqI0NFrlrsnUl/zN03Cr3jFaQsy2FYF PM5fvh5PLsVxGDtobK61zIUugQTcBkvYEk2k4IBY8WsguFr9+Bmbt+ZtLieYz9P/JboR vXOZSXRO0zSs+WAAT6ifEEDoMLXKme+GdoyiY2hGjyHZL8W6rJVoeJ2vLkB8d3hRuKa/ SizKDRptlFwoNMEX5EobTfO1VHnUDP9KE/tEbOaGVtaSJKCElyMTjoe5LPi1AwuWSNS1 LCwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679569014; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=B53t85PFu51dfvSDbZbCGX7SdLvRCaAa1P1shQzSHI8=; b=hNeGtCKsRnltGCWkjgTTXMiD/2E1FmSJq+w4Uy9qNK4HBgmS4EO2b0nfwS5yksRH27 oBLDcTpbf1HcBiOwpZ1VQehvtWI0hPoGkGEXuD43A8DUkYnZ4yzaff0phzv6vzGk+n6B NG2Qt3lnVrGmYJ8WTYuHjKkAtVY0PzhtVoGFw+9WzZo3rZANY9yAyZv6cYmkVCdKRJNr CYIHLJES7bVWhq1UzN1KSczxZpNBBFG2Cy9Q/OH40xlWgdgC33b1Bn6DWpMGUgN3wETm /5QNtmfrzMWO+smg0K+37Vi6y5Ctp9/vJ//AMWe0AukKImHyZBfvOPmtRo5ye89GkB22 Bc2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXDCB9HRd4PmAv6Kwr/ukJGX5en5jW62lRrU6z0ZZiwGfz8/LZc A4DBSaNW5MEY3pVWGrxsgfneNluZCFTlY40eyQA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/dZknDfRi/U93wFndc4NL106+vtcMlVQV6mAk4bnzQBdeDpG5KoQ5rMUVsmHhYoz/V8Q4L29rhda7NRdk+FWg= X-Received: by 2002:a50:bb4c:0:b0:501:d2f5:7da9 with SMTP id y70-20020a50bb4c000000b00501d2f57da9mr4910298ede.0.1679569014165; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 03:56:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230323020458.54515-1-kmatsui@cs.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Ville Voutilainen Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: use __bool_constant instead of integral_constant To: Ken Matsui Cc: Jonathan Wakely , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 12:53, Ken Matsui wrote: > > DCO sign-off is indeed more light-weight, and sure, it's becoming more common > > since it's relatively new as an option. > > Thank you! > > To add a DCO sign-off, do I need to bump up the subject line to [PATCH v2]? No. The format of the subject for patch submission emails is not that strict. :)