From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27895 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2013 10:58:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27886 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2013 10:58:49 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:58:49 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x13so2513228vbb.20 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 03:58:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.18.206 with SMTP id y14mr11728882vdd.29.1366887527249; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 03:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.164.115 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 03:58:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <66f9c26154ca4916a3b92b5ebb9e8910@SN2PR07MB029.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> References: <533cf85bfb7f48bca2fd6baeb2336147@SN2PR07MB029.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5168081A.8000608@arm.com> <516D58C7.5000306@arm.com> <66f9c26154ca4916a3b92b5ebb9e8910@SN2PR07MB029.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, AArch64] Compare instruction in shift_extend mode From: Marcus Shawcroft To: "Hurugalawadi, Naveen" Cc: Marcus Shawcroft , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01528.txt.bz2 OK. Thank you. /Marcus On 17 April 2013 11:05, Hurugalawadi, Naveen wrote: > Hi, > >>> I suggest for this one test case either making it compile only and >>> dropping main() such that the pattern match only looks in the >>> assembled output of the cmp_* functions > > The testcase will check only for assembly pattern of the instruction > as per your suggestion. > > Please find attached the modified patch let me know if there should > be any further modifications in it. > > Thanks, > Naveen >