* [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern.
@ 2015-04-28 16:01 Renlin Li
2015-04-29 12:10 ` Marcus Shawcroft
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Renlin Li @ 2015-04-28 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Cc: Alan Lawrence, Marcus Shawcroft, James.Greenhalgh, Ramana Radhakrishnan
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]
Hi all,
unsigned shift left dosen't support immediate shift. Previouly, gcc will
generate asm instruction like this: "ushl d1, d0, 32", which is not a
legal insn and will be rejected by assembler. This patch change the use
of ushl in vec_shr_<mode> into shl.
A test case is added, and it passes on both aarch64-none-elf and
aarch64_be-none-elf tool-chain.
Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-04-28 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_shr_<mode>): Use shl.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-28 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c: New.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name=2.diff, Size: 1489 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
index 0557570..41706fb 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
@@ -788,7 +788,7 @@
"TARGET_SIMD"
{
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
- return "ushl %d0, %d1, %2";
+ return "shl %d0, %d1, %2";
else
return "ushr %d0, %d1, %2";
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5d9460
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -fdump-tree-vect-all" } */
+/* Write a reduction loop to be reduced using whole vector right shift. */
+
+extern void abort(void);
+
+unsigned char in[8] __attribute__((__aligned__(16)));
+
+int
+main (unsigned char argc, char **argv)
+{
+ unsigned char i = 0;
+ unsigned char sum = 1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+ in[i] = (i + i + 1) & 0xfd;
+
+ /* Prevent constant propagation of the entire loop below. */
+ asm volatile ("" : : : "memory");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+ sum |= in[i];
+
+ if (sum != 13)
+ {
+ __builtin_printf("Failed %d\n", sum);
+ abort();
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Reduce using vector shifts" "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern.
2015-04-28 16:01 [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern Renlin Li
@ 2015-04-29 12:10 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-04-30 11:58 ` Renlin Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Shawcroft @ 2015-04-29 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Renlin Li; +Cc: gcc-patches, Alan Lawrence
On 28 April 2015 at 16:41, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> unsigned shift left dosen't support immediate shift. Previouly, gcc will
> generate asm instruction like this: "ushl d1, d0, 32", which is not a legal
> insn and will be rejected by assembler. This patch change the use of ushl in
> vec_shr_<mode> into shl.
>
> A test case is added, and it passes on both aarch64-none-elf and
> aarch64_be-none-elf tool-chain.
>
> Okay to commit?
>
> Regards,
> Renlin Li
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2015-04-28 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_shr_<mode>): Use shl.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2015-04-28 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
> Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com>
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c: New.
I think there is another issue here, this change:
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
- return "ushl %d0, %d1, %2";
+ return "shl %d0, %d1, %2";
else
return "ushr %d0, %d1, %2";
is in the context of:
(define_insn "vec_shr_<mode>"
[(set (match_operand:VD 0 "register_operand" "=w")
(lshiftrt:VD (match_operand:VD 1 "register_operand" "w")
(match_operand:SI 2 "immediate_operand" "i")))]
The RTL describes a right shift of the bits within each element in the
vector while the optab expects a right shift of the elements within
the vector?
/Marcus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern.
2015-04-29 12:10 ` Marcus Shawcroft
@ 2015-04-30 11:58 ` Renlin Li
2015-04-30 15:23 ` Marcus Shawcroft
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Renlin Li @ 2015-04-30 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcus Shawcroft; +Cc: gcc-patches, Alan Lawrence
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1301 bytes --]
Hi Marcus,
On 29/04/15 13:06, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> I think there is another issue here, this change:
>
> if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
> - return "ushl %d0, %d1, %2";
> + return "shl %d0, %d1, %2";
> else
> return "ushr %d0, %d1, %2";
>
> is in the context of:
>
> (define_insn "vec_shr_<mode>"
> [(set (match_operand:VD 0 "register_operand" "=w")
> (lshiftrt:VD (match_operand:VD 1 "register_operand" "w")
> (match_operand:SI 2 "immediate_operand" "i")))]
You are right. This pattern has ambiguity. I have updated the patch, and
represent vec_shr as an upspec. This will prevent other rtx patterns
implicitly matching this one.
The new patch is attached, is it Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_shr): Defined as an unspec.
* config/aarch64/iterators.md (unspec): Add UNSPEC_VEC_SHR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c: New.
> The RTL describes a right shift of the bits within each element in the
> vector while the optab expects a right shift of the elements within
> the vector?
>
> /Marcus
>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 3.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name=3.diff, Size: 2427 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
index 0557570..6304eae6 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
@@ -783,12 +783,13 @@
;; For 64-bit modes we use ushl/r, as this does not require a SIMD zero.
(define_insn "vec_shr_<mode>"
[(set (match_operand:VD 0 "register_operand" "=w")
- (lshiftrt:VD (match_operand:VD 1 "register_operand" "w")
- (match_operand:SI 2 "immediate_operand" "i")))]
+ (unspec:VD [(match_operand:VD 1 "register_operand" "w")
+ (match_operand:SI 2 "immediate_operand" "i")]
+ UNSPEC_VEC_SHR))]
"TARGET_SIMD"
{
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
- return "ushl %d0, %d1, %2";
+ return "shl %d0, %d1, %2";
else
return "ushr %d0, %d1, %2";
}
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
index 1fdff04..498358a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@
UNSPEC_PMULL ; Used in aarch64-simd.md.
UNSPEC_PMULL2 ; Used in aarch64-simd.md.
UNSPEC_REV_REGLIST ; Used in aarch64-simd.md.
+ UNSPEC_VEC_SHR ; Used in aarch64-simd.md.
])
;; -------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5d9460
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -fdump-tree-vect-all" } */
+/* Write a reduction loop to be reduced using whole vector right shift. */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+
+unsigned char in[8] __attribute__((__aligned__(16)));
+
+int
+main (unsigned char argc, char **argv)
+{
+ unsigned char i = 0;
+ unsigned char sum = 1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+ in[i] = (i + i + 1) & 0xfd;
+
+ /* Prevent constant propagation of the entire loop below. */
+ asm volatile ("" : : : "memory");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+ sum |= in[i];
+
+ if (sum != 13)
+ {
+ __builtin_printf("Failed %d\n", sum);
+ abort();
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Reduce using vector shifts" "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern.
2015-04-30 11:58 ` Renlin Li
@ 2015-04-30 15:23 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-06-02 9:30 ` Renlin Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Shawcroft @ 2015-04-30 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Renlin Li; +Cc: gcc-patches, Alan Lawrence
On 30 April 2015 at 12:55, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
> 2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_shr): Defined as an unspec.
> * config/aarch64/iterators.md (unspec): Add UNSPEC_VEC_SHR.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c: New.
+ __builtin_printf("Failed %d\n", sum);
+ abort();
Space before (
Otherwise OK /Marcus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern.
2015-04-30 15:23 ` Marcus Shawcroft
@ 2015-06-02 9:30 ` Renlin Li
2015-06-02 9:48 ` Marcus Shawcroft
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Renlin Li @ 2015-06-02 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcus Shawcroft; +Cc: gcc-patches, Alan Lawrence
Is it Okay for me to backport it to gcc-5?
Regards,
Renlin Li
On 30/04/15 16:21, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 30 April 2015 at 12:55, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> 2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>>
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_shr): Defined as an unspec.
>> * config/aarch64/iterators.md (unspec): Add UNSPEC_VEC_SHR.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c: New.
> + __builtin_printf("Failed %d\n", sum);
> + abort();
>
> Space before (
> Otherwise OK /Marcus
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern.
2015-06-02 9:30 ` Renlin Li
@ 2015-06-02 9:48 ` Marcus Shawcroft
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Shawcroft @ 2015-06-02 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Renlin Li; +Cc: gcc-patches, Alan Lawrence
On 2 June 2015 at 10:30, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
> Is it Okay for me to backport it to gcc-5?
OK provided the patch applies cleanly and there are no regressions. /Marcus
>
> Regards,
> Renlin Li
>
>
> On 30/04/15 16:21, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>>
>> On 30 April 2015 at 12:55, Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>>>
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_shr): Defined as an unspec.
>>> * config/aarch64/iterators.md (unspec): Add UNSPEC_VEC_SHR.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 2015-04-30 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
>>>
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/vect-reduc-or_1.c: New.
>>
>> + __builtin_printf("Failed %d\n", sum);
>> + abort();
>>
>> Space before (
>> Otherwise OK /Marcus
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-02 9:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-28 16:01 [PATCH][AARCH64]Use shl for vec_shr_<mode> rtx pattern Renlin Li
2015-04-29 12:10 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-04-30 11:58 ` Renlin Li
2015-04-30 15:23 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-06-02 9:30 ` Renlin Li
2015-06-02 9:48 ` Marcus Shawcroft
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).