From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8963 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2014 11:04:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8951 invoked by uid 89); 24 Oct 2014 11:04:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yh0-f54.google.com Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-yh0-f54.google.com) (209.85.213.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:04:54 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 29so164320yhl.27 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 04:04:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.202.196 with SMTP id t187mr5581335yke.36.1414148692317; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 04:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.253.33 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 04:04:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5447BD29.4060504@arm.com> References: <5447BD29.4060504@arm.com> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] LINK_SPEC changes for Cortex-A53 erratum 835769 workaround From: Marcus Shawcroft To: Kyrill Tkachov , jakub@redhat.com Cc: GCC Patches , Marcus Shawcroft , Tejas Belagod Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg02526.txt.bz2 On 22 October 2014 15:20, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch contains the LINK_SPEC changes required to pass on the linker > option --fix-cortex-a53-835769 when compiling with -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 > (or by default when configured with --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769). > > This requires a binutils installation with the patch posted at > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-10/msg00198.html applied. > > > Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and built various > benchmarks. > This patch applies to 4.9 (4.8 version will be posted separately) and has > been tested there as well. > > Ok for trunk and 4.9? The corresponding binutils changes are committed on binutils trunk, 2.25 and 2.24. The trunk patch is OK. Given that Jakub is in the process of preparing a 4.9.2 I'd like an explicit OK before we commit on 4.9. Jakub? Cheers /Marcus