From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jimw@sifive.com>
Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B24573857830
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu,  4 Feb 2021 23:48:56 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B24573857830
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jimw@sifive.com
Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id f14so8658241ejc.8
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:48:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=TyB/yOuIEXCDlNDyNxg3+YfefOPEtjZLC/yYCDxl4LI=;
 b=hZLFWF2ZvW7I2SnR7zv4R6RgQLXISdZ8Bq1pfgJepws0q8hYl9cPn6UNhklGeCBEGd
 EZtX15baFW0wykWSBSf1wAX6usmzcPOs2o9KiGAYpZEZZ2mqTUAqVkTIpVCkno0q6dL7
 A1cA+l1+SVzEvD74XrZY6LegeL42/oS06rUo1/ArIuNaAoTfYAuV8OaW2uu7vTnBXNLE
 242g3nu2l6HOLi3LNcWIwZSbKdRLB3aZPj7nb2hEiaIPoUkDQfhLvHDx2phrrSoWYK5b
 Ckxh8AXfx7IIFAGOlXK+BahTTZqGtaC9etXWWfKF5YjYRUIlBukMK41lIKIj4uWAhxhL
 CA+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=TyB/yOuIEXCDlNDyNxg3+YfefOPEtjZLC/yYCDxl4LI=;
 b=F13Pb7IQs5N/3qGgwdNFXW1Sj4vo/LTZLzQ0ShN7N7F/JNV/DisfUzRcMuscNYraZt
 P3fAWHZT/ERInsCbDRJ42Y2iq4ZxRLVlaHXClbK48xA6SmpTvVsosJi8f2bZrlvKUs2b
 auZC+csxUjU7uddbOP4sSlejIxhfzVxDu+QRaRJ0elD2iLvtR/mG/7OW3JbfkXVwUuPO
 IM69ZNNXkK/Ae8cLyi9MUey1BD2eekER6OCxXTSy0/mhbsRFsbG7ubNQEiP4Z3C3v9ZT
 qHgN6INDqjDYhrDQ+Q6nYWuJ9HV15SpZJjxevJPCYADHQjWrB8pInfNm3gv0nq1NcKSm
 Rj9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VTHUD2czESZa2huxFMIZYyK+5kIOV77azqA7eGPP/ekRe3hGV
 1lK27jrlqFJcFQmpCVKIh61cAVihYUNnaXwB2vYf+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjcVGijvUK7RdUwgvFBMYQVse4GdeRdw59MYUNtlGk93ZxLil+BBrrIEzrn3CxXeHHvEvhKx3cKlxfWeQ7U+o=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:82c9:: with SMTP id
 a9mr1389927ejy.547.1612482535816; 
 Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:48:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpMh+DKrNikbxMyzNA3wdDwqqEMvVr9YcM_KGtSmE5zd7CD7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+yXCZBTO8=KvqTGyORhGKrqByAZC09nT0NHAb1NAW8VPW_2LA@mail.gmail.com>
 <82D6E3CF-36C9-4D84-BFC1-A35FCEDED358@gmail.com>
 <CALLt3ThJMf-nk4DJHOPHgGVNcGdeNZhKRY+Y1BpnA-9qUQLh4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALLt3ThJMf-nk4DJHOPHgGVNcGdeNZhKRY+Y1BpnA-9qUQLh4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:48:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFyWVabdtWZ-M3hQQsMxLc4fkNKTcm-QLRBveVnasJqyhgnbOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix -march option parsing when `p` extension
 exists.
To: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Cc: Xing GUO <higuoxing@gmail.com>, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>, 
 GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 23:48:59 -0000

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:49 PM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> wrote:

> I think this patch is small enough to accept without FSF copyright
> assignment, and he is also on the way of the process, what do you
> think?
>

I see the copyright assignments on file at the FSF when I checked today.

Jim